01-14-2021, 06:14 PM,
(This post was last modified: 01-14-2021, 06:18 PM by AussieMick.)
|
|
|
AussieMick
Legendary Member
     
|
Posts: 1,503
Threads: 47
Joined: Dec 2017
|
|
|
RE: Assassination Trivia
Hi Eva,
I thought that I'd found two but now see that one of them was for VICE President. I found this one first ... James Speed. U.S. Attorney General James Speed issued a legal opinion stating that the conspirators not only could be, but must be, tried by a military commission. I see that in 1868, Speed ran for the Republican nomination for Vice President of the United States.
I then found Brevet Major-General Hartranft. He was assigned to duty as Special Provost Marshal General and read the death warrant to the individuals who were executed.
At the Republican National Convention in June 1876, he was a contender for the presidential nomination, but Rutherford B. Hayes of Ohio was eventually selected.
(BTW, mainly of interest only to me , I am constantly getting James Speed confused with his brother Joshua Speed .... I blame David Herbert Donald's book "Lincoln" where the indexing for them seems odd. It refers to Page 88 for James Speed when I'm sure it is Joshua. There again, it could just be me !)
“The honest man, tho' e'er sae poor,
Is king o' men for a' that” Robert Burns
|
|
|
01-15-2021, 09:48 AM,
(This post was last modified: 01-15-2021, 09:54 AM by Eva Elisabeth.)
|
|
|
Eva Elisabeth
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 6,598
Threads: 69
Joined: Apr 2013
|
|
RE: Assassination Trivia
(01-15-2021, 12:47 AM)Steve Wrote: I didn't know Winfield Hancock could be counted since he was actually nominated at one of the conventions he was a candidate. So, I guess you can include Pres. Andrew Johnson since he was a candidate at the 1868 Democratic convention. Steve, as Mike said, none became President. But I didn't explicitly exclude they actually were candidates rather than just being considered - I didn't want to make it too easy (and this is something that could well be approached by yes/no questions...)
(01-15-2021, 07:05 AM)RJNorton Wrote: I am having problems in attempting to research this. Kudos on such a challenging question. Can you say if any of the correct answers were witnesses in the trial?
Good question, Roger. No, none was a witness, but the remaining two played an active role on the legal side.
Hint #3: I suggest to ask more y/n questions to specify what legal side.
(Roger - I, too, found it a great and very welcome challenge in my Xmas break right because it is not a Google-one-click-thing but requires real research. Yet it should be possible for anyone as the names are well known here.)
|
|
|
|