What are you reading now?

[Eva Elisabeth]

(01-12-2014 08:20 PM)Tom Bogar Wrote:  I don't think it was a matter of credibility, Eva. He provided what testimony he was encouraged/directed to give. He certainly asked enough questions and kept his eyes and ears open in the short time he was backstage at Ford's. To me, he is/was not credible, but he was able to twist/magnify what few things he picked up to provide testimony that made Ned Spangler look pretty guilty to those who needed someone to be held accountable.

If he willingly testified in favor of offering a(nother) culprit, I wonder what his motives were. Seemingly he didn't benefit a lot therefrom - didn't he later unsuccessfully sue the government to receive compensation for his lost tool kit?