|
07-06-2014, 08:06 PM,
|
|
|
Jenny
Senior Member
   
|
Posts: 255
Threads: 5
Joined: Sep 2012
|
|
RE: Can You Spot the Historical Inaccuracies?
(07-06-2014, 05:59 PM)L Verge Wrote: Dramatic effect is exactly what it is all about. While we know that Mary was near death (literally) approaching the gallows and that Lew was the height of fortitude, it is much more effective to show the facial expressions of a strong Mary without the veil and the sniveling of a strong man brought down.
Agreed! That's one of the other things that caught my eye since we know Mrs. Surratt was veiled, sedated, weeping, and generally "half-dead" during the final walk and on the scaffold. The film makers were going for a strong Mary Surratt who stoically faced death because they were big on the "unyielding mother dying in place of her son" theme.
I really did enjoy the movie overall despite inaccuracies and some miscasting.  I will have to watch it again soon.
|
|
|
|
07-07-2014, 12:01 AM,
|
|
|
historybuff22
Senior Member
   
|
Posts: 132
Threads: 51
Joined: Feb 2013
|
|
RE: Can You Spot the Historical Inaccuracies?
(07-05-2014, 05:48 PM)BettyO Wrote: Same here, Linda. I blew up that silly thing and I don't think either of those guards is Barry - JMO -
I do wish both would post more - but they're busy with their jobs....
Unfortunately, I'm getting to be the same way -
Great about the drums - and yes, I saw the young kid with the drum; but he sure wasn't playing it!
Actually, the boy shown in the movie was John Collins and he wasn't a drummer boy. Rather, he was a 13-year-old that had snuck (or is it sneaked) into the hanging not realizing what he would actually see. He confessed that seeing the hanging made him very ill and gave him nightmares for years.
Rick Brown
HistoryBuff.com
A Nonprofit Organization
|
|
|
|