07-08-2013, 12:21 PM,
(This post was last modified: 07-08-2013, 12:36 PM by barryssentials.)
|
|
|
RE: ** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO
(07-07-2013, 01:37 PM)John E. Wrote: (07-07-2013, 11:55 AM)L Verge Wrote: Is Waddell the correct spelling or Wardell? I met Jacob Mogelever one time courtesy of James O. Hall and still like his book. I wonder what happened to his papers? Also, Andrew Jampoler, author of The Last Lincoln Conspirator, is a friend; and he writes extensively on naval themes. I'm going to run Waddell's name past him to see if we can make any ties to a Wardell also.
James I. Waddell is the correct spelling from the book. Its not quite exact but Barry suspects that perhaps someone used it as inspiration for the name James A. Wardell.
Hi everyone. This isn't even in the realm of what I'd consider a theory on my part (lol) but rather just another possible avenue of exploration. I thought it was an interesting coincidence that the Wardell letter mentions both Wardell and Baker more than once and the Mogelever book shows an interesting 'name similarity' between Waddell and Baker. I admit, it is far fetched and probably not worth the thought (but that is how my mind works). If one were to assume that the Wardell letter was a fabrication (created after 1960), then the 1960 Mogelever book could have been partially responsible for the name creation. However, I am currently under the belief that the letter was faked and concocted sometime in the early 1900s after Oldroyd's book came out. No proof about this, but just my present state of mind. Happy History! Barry
|
|
|
|
07-09-2013, 09:10 AM,
|
|
|
wsanto
Senior Member
   
|
Posts: 285
Threads: 5
Joined: Nov 2012
|
|
RE: ** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO
(07-08-2013, 12:21 PM)barryssentials Wrote: James I. Waddell is the correct spelling from the bo
Hi everyone. This isn't even in the realm of what I'd consider a theory on my part (lol) but rather just another possible avenue of exploration. I thought it was an interesting coincidence that the Wardell letter mentions both Wardell and Baker more than once and the Mogelever book shows an interesting 'name similarity' between Waddell and Baker. I admit, it is far fetched and probably not worth the thought (but that is how my mind works). If one were to assume that the Wardell letter was a fabrication (created after 1960), then the 1960 Mogelever book could have been partially responsible for the name creation. However, I am currently under the belief that the letter was faked and concocted sometime in the early 1900s after Oldroyd's book came out. No proof about this, but just my present state of mind. Happy History! Barry
Could Mogelever have misspelled Wardell's name in his book? It does seem coincidental but the coincidence could go either way.
((( | '€ :} |###] -- }: {/ ]
|
|
|
|
07-10-2013, 07:45 PM,
|
|
|
RE: ** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO
(07-09-2013, 09:10 AM)wsanto Wrote: [quote='barryssentials' pid='21290' dateline='1373300472']
James I. Waddell is the correct spelling from Mogelever's book and has a history that can be traced. However, you are correct that as far as a coincidence goes, like so many bits of history, they can be interpreted in so many different ways. Thanks.
Barry
Could Mogelever have misspelled Wardell's name in his book? It does seem coincidental but the coincidence could go either way.
|
|
|
|
07-11-2013, 11:46 AM,
|
|
|
John E.
Senior Member
   
|
Posts: 219
Threads: 29
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: ** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO
For anyone living in the DC area, Terry Alford sent me a nice lead regarding names of Federal agents. I had no idea of this particular source.
Edward C. Fishel’s (papers, located at Georgetown library, contain a comprehensive index of federal agents. If I was in the area, I would check it out with the belief that his name will not turn up. But I'd still check.
http://repository.library.georgetown.edu...sequence=1
If anyone gets the chance or is motivated to look in to this further, please let me know.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
07-12-2013, 03:53 PM,
|
|
|
John E.
Senior Member
   
|
Posts: 219
Threads: 29
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: ** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO
(07-11-2013, 12:05 PM)Gene C Wrote: I'd be interest to know if Andrew Potter is on that list.
Has anyone read Fishel's Book?
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0395901...EF4CMMS3MN
Hello Gene,
I ordered a used copy of it and hope it will arrive soon. I'll be sure to check if Andrew Potter's name is mentioned.
|
|
|
|
07-12-2013, 08:58 PM,
|
|
|
L Verge
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 9,092
Threads: 493
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
|
RE: ** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO
This is just my personal take on the subject (and I dealt with Mark Katz while he was writing and then selling his book - which is beautiful):
So far as I can tell from Mr. Katz's citation in the book and from what papers at the James O. Hall Research Center indicate, the Wardell "letter" only exists as a TRANSCRIPT (shades of Joseph Lynch and the missing pages from Booth's diary - a transcript that got easily dissected as a fake back in the early-1980s.). At the time Katz was writing the Gardner book (which includes much more than just this one topic), it is my understanding that the TRANSCRIPT was in the hands of Lincoln artist/collector Lloyd Ostendorf (whose integrity has been questioned on several other occasions). In fact, the citation refers to it as a transcript from Lloyd Ostendorf.
I never met Mr. Ostendorf, and he is now deceased. I don't feel that it is fair for us to judge him on this occasion. Does anyone know what happened to his Lincoln-related holdings? Does anyone know from whom he acquired even the transcript of the Wardell letter? Does anyone know if Oldroyd or Ostendorf or anyone ever said that they had the original? One of the best researchers in the field, Michael Kauffman, told John Elliott that he never found proof of Wardell even existing. To me, that says a lot because I know the amount of time, money, blood, sweat, and tears that Kauffman put into his work.
In a recent telephone conversation with some folks, however, I was told that another gentleman has claimed that he found the Lawrence Gardner article several years ago and is upset that John Elliott has brought it to everyone's attention first. This person, however, evidently uses several aliases or just his e-mail moniker in his correspondence. He also sounds like he is very protective of the memory of both Oldroyd and Ostendorf. If I remember correctly, Robert Lincoln had very little good to say about Oldroyd...
The search for Wardell and his original letter is yet another avenue for us to travel down. Mr. Hall used to call our gang the Baker Street Irregulars. Those of you familiar with Sherlock Holmes will get the connection. Any Irregulars out there want to join in the search?
|
|
|
|
07-12-2013, 09:23 PM,
|
|
|
|
RE: ** NEW DISCOVERY REGARDING BOOTH AUTOPSY PHOTO
What was R. T. Lincoln's criticism of Olroyd?
|
|
|
|