National Audubon Society, pressure to remove slave-owning naturalist’s name, keeps it
|
03-15-2023, 12:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-15-2023 12:07 PM by David Lockmiller.)
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
National Audubon Society, pressure to remove slave-owning naturalist’s name, keeps it
Washington Post
By Dino Grandoni March 15, 2023 The National Audubon Society, one of the country’s best-known bird conservation organizations, decided in a closed-door vote this week to retain the name of John James Audubon, famed 19th-century naturalist and wildlife illustrator who was also an unabashed enslaver. The group’s namesake looms large in the world of birds. In the early 19th century, Audubon traveled around the North American wilderness to document the continent’s feathered life. His vivid paintings of the ivory-billed woodpecker, American flamingo and hundreds of other species culminated in his seminal “Birds of America,” printed between 1827 and 1838. He died in 1851 a world-famous wildlife artist and ornithologist. Even his critics acknowledge he is the “founding father of American birding.” "So very difficult a matter is it to trace and find out the truth of anything by history." -- Plutarch |
|||
03-18-2023, 12:37 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
National Audubon Society, pressure to remove slave-owning naturalist’s name, keeps it
(03-15-2023 12:04 PM)David Lockmiller Wrote: Washington Post Is this the complete article? It doesn't explain much. |
|||
03-18-2023, 01:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-18-2023 01:58 PM by David Lockmiller.)
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
National Audubon Society, pressure to remove slave-owning naturalist’s name, keeps it
(03-18-2023 12:37 PM)Steve Wrote:(03-15-2023 12:04 PM)David Lockmiller Wrote: Washington Post It's not the complete article. The point that I was attempting to make is about the pressures to erase history as a result of an individual having owned slaves at a time when it was constitutional to do so. Please note the precautions taken now in 2023 by those who refuse to participate in such historical reprisals: "The National Audubon Society, one of the country’s best-known bird conservation organizations, decided in a closed-door vote this week to retain the name of John James Audubon, famed 19th-century naturalist and wildlife illustrator who was also an unabashed enslaver. Why was a closed-door vote necessary? "So very difficult a matter is it to trace and find out the truth of anything by history." -- Plutarch |
|||
03-19-2023, 07:35 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: National Audubon Society, pressure to
(03-18-2023 01:56 PM)David Lockmiller Wrote: Why was a closed-door vote necessary? To avoid harassment focused on the individual. So when is this "Old Enough To Know Better" supposed to kick in? |
|||
03-19-2023, 09:23 AM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: National Audubon Society, pressure to
(03-19-2023 07:35 AM)Gene C Wrote:(03-18-2023 01:56 PM)David Lockmiller Wrote: Why was a closed-door vote necessary? President Joe Biden signed a bill Thursday, June 16, 2022, that will give around-the-clock security protection to the families of Supreme Court justices. The new law, which passed the House this week and the Senate last month, comes eight days after a man carrying a gun, knife and zip ties was arrested near Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s house after threatening to kill the justice. The bill calling for the expansion of security protections was approved unanimously by the Senate and passed shortly after the leak of a draft court opinion that would overrule Roe v. Wade and sharply curtail abortion rights in roughly half the states. No mention was made in the law for protections to be afforded to members of the Audubon Society. "So very difficult a matter is it to trace and find out the truth of anything by history." -- Plutarch |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)