|
11-20-2019, 03:16 PM,
|
|
|
Steve
Legendary Member
     
|
Posts: 1,670
Threads: 139
Joined: Jan 2017
|
|
Hiram Hibbard pardon
I just came across this story from 5 years ago about a forged Lincoln pardon:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanraab/...cfff9c142e
Here's a link to a transcription of the forgery which actually made it into the Collected Works:
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/te...ncoln8:668
Does anybody know of any updates to this story? Since Hibbard is actually known to have been pardoned for desertion, has anybody been able to find a copy of the real pardon yet?
|
|
|
|
11-23-2019, 01:05 PM,
|
|
|
Gene C
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 6,352
Threads: 359
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: Hiram Hibbard pardon
I looked up Hiram Hibbard in "Don't Shoot That Boy - Abraham Lincoln and Military Justice" by Thomas Lowry.
For what it's worth, he wasn't listed. His offense may not have earned him the death penalty which this book focused on
Secondly, I noticed the first document Roger posted was typed. This appears to me to have been well after the date of 1865 on the document, as typewriters were not immediately commercially successful, until the 1880's and 1890's.
https://blog.oup.com/2018/06/nine-striki...ypewriter/
So when is this "Old Enough To Know Better" supposed to kick in?
|
|
|
11-23-2019, 04:37 PM,
(This post was last modified: 11-23-2019, 04:40 PM by L Verge.)
|
|
|
L Verge
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 9,092
Threads: 493
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: Hiram Hibbard pardon
(11-23-2019, 01:05 PM)Gene C Wrote: I looked up Hiram Hibbard in "Don't Shoot That Boy - Abraham Lincoln and Military Justice" by Thomas Lowry.
For what it's worth, he wasn't listed. His offense may not have earned him the death penalty which this book focused on
Secondly, I noticed the first document Roger posted was typed. This appears to me to have been well after the date of 1865 on the document, as typewriters were not immediately commercially successful, until the 1880's and 1890's.
https://blog.oup.com/2018/06/nine-striki...ypewriter/
I am not sure that is a typed document. I believe that it was a typeset, printed piece. E.D. Townsend's name on it smacks more of 1865. The word "extract", however, does seem to indicate that it is a second rendering of the official order -- extracted for whom?
|
|
|
11-24-2019, 04:17 AM,
(This post was last modified: 11-24-2019, 04:21 AM by Steve.)
|
|
|
Steve
Legendary Member
     
|
Posts: 1,670
Threads: 139
Joined: Jan 2017
|
|
|
RE: Hiram Hibbard pardon
Laurie is correct the order was typeset printed, not typed. This microfilmed image of the order was the next image in the microfilm order following the image of Hibbard's muster roll abstract (the image of his second enlistment, where he deserted in Nov. 1864 -- #1680).
These muster roll abstracts were created by the state of New York (starting in 1876) copying the information from all of the original muster-out rolls of New York soldiers.
The full wording of the special order listed the pardons and commutations of several soldiers at once, the "extracts" are copies of the order with just the section for the specific soldier printed, so there are a couple of copies for the soldier's unit records/chain of command.
From the original microfilm images (they were cropped for Forum legibility), it looks like the order was folded between Hibbard's record and another soldier's record in the physical copy. I'd guess the order extract was printed in 1865 and placed in this record from some other record, rather than a new copy made in the 1870's. But I suppose we'd have to contact someone at the New York state archives to be sure of that.
|
|
|
|