Post Reply 
Food for Thought
08-19-2019, 06:58 AM
Post: #76
RE: Food for Thought
(08-18-2019 06:07 PM)L Verge Wrote:  [quote='bob_summers' pid='78327' dateline='1566160031']
[quote='L Verge' pid='78322' dateline='1566151224']
[quote='Anita' pid='78317' dateline='1566091609']
[quote='L Verge' pid='78315' dateline='1566086869']
[quote='Anita' pid='78314' dateline='1566080245']

Thanks for the information, Bob. Were the Mudds able to pay them for their services, or did Henry Lowe Mudd and Jeremiah Dyer help out? What about when Dr. Sam was in prison?

Laurie: Sam & Sara were apparently able to pay their post-emancipation farm hands themselves. Frank Washington testified at the trial that Dr. Mudd paid him $130 a year, equivalent to $4,000 today.

But it was obviously a financial struggle for Sara to pay farm workers and legal bills after Sam went to prison. She paid Ewing his fee, which she said was "not an inconsiderable one." She also paid $2,000 to print 700 copies of Ewing's arguments and the evidence he offered to defend Sam. Ewing gave these out to the military jurors and anyone else he thought could help Sam's case.

The money for all this probably came from a combination of Sam & Sara's own savings, plus help from Mudd and Dyer family members. Online inflation calculators say that $1,000 in 1860 was equivalent to $30,000 today, so the drain on family resources was enormous.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
08-19-2019, 01:43 PM
Post: #77
RE: Food for Thought
(08-19-2019 06:58 AM)bob_summers Wrote:  
(08-18-2019 06:07 PM)L Verge Wrote:  [quote='bob_summers' pid='78327' dateline='1566160031']
[quote='L Verge' pid='78322' dateline='1566151224']
[quote='Anita' pid='78317' dateline='1566091609']
[quote='L Verge' pid='78315' dateline='1566086869']
[quote='Anita' pid='78314' dateline='1566080245']

Thanks for the information, Bob. Were the Mudds able to pay them for their services, or did Henry Lowe Mudd and Jeremiah Dyer help out? What about when Dr. Sam was in prison?

Laurie: Sam & Sara were apparently able to pay their post-emancipation farm hands themselves. Frank Washington testified at the trial that Dr. Mudd paid him $130 a year, equivalent to $4,000 today.

But it was obviously a financial struggle for Sara to pay farm workers and legal bills after Sam went to prison. She paid Ewing his fee, which she said was "not an inconsiderable one." She also paid $2,000 to print 700 copies of Ewing's arguments and the evidence he offered to defend Sam. Ewing gave these out to the military jurors and anyone else he thought could help Sam's case.

The money for all this probably came from a combination of Sam & Sara's own savings, plus help from Mudd and Dyer family members. Online inflation calculators say that $1,000 in 1860 was equivalent to $30,000 today, so the drain on family resources was enormous.

Thanks for the info. Can we assume that they also entered into sharecropping or tenant farming agreements with the free families? I know that's how my family managed two farms from the post-Civil War period until the death of tobacco farming in Maryland ca. 1960.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
08-19-2019, 03:03 PM
Post: #78
RE: Food for Thought
(08-19-2019 01:43 PM)L Verge Wrote:  Thanks for the info. Can we assume that they also entered into sharecropping or tenant farming agreements with the free families? I know that's how my family managed two farms from the post-Civil War period until the death of tobacco farming in Maryland ca. 1960.

Laurie: Yes, I think we can assume they did. My mother told me there was a sharecropping family living in a small house on the farm when she grew up there - Richard and Laura Stewart. They called them Uncle Richard and Aunt Laura. My mother was born there on September 28, 1911, two months before Sara Mudd died there.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-15-2019, 04:37 PM
Post: #79
RE: Food for Thought
(07-30-2019 07:06 PM)L Verge Wrote:  First, I want to credit Dave Taylor's BoothieBarn for carrying this posting regarding why President Andrew Johnson probably pardoned the Lincoln conspirators held at Fort Jefferson at the time that he did. Interesting point made by Sandy Prindle, a retired Texas judge who spoke on his new book at the Surratt conference in April.

Sandy Prindle
I contend in my just released book “Booth’s Confederate Connections” by Pelican Publishing that Dr. Mudd, like the other two surviving prisoners at Dry Tortugas, were pardoned by President Andrew Johnson, not because of [Mudd's] efforts in the yellow fever epidemic, but because of their impending habeas corpus actions before the Supreme Court. The pardons were granted a year and a half after the epidemic but just weeks before a Supreme Court decision was expected. Johnson did not want his behavior revisited about Mary Surratt being executed by an illegal court. In addition, he didn’t want the press to dig up the fact that he treated Mary Surratt’s daughter badly on the day of the execution nor that the prisoners were given just twenty-four hours notice of their execution. It was a legacy that he didn’t want to face, in view of the fact that he was leaving the White House in disgrace. The ex-parte Milligan ruling would have caused him much more grief than he could overcome.

While searching for the source of the reference to the lone shark that patrolled the waters of the moat at Fort Jefferson, I ran across an interesting article from the October 18, 2011, edition of the Washington Post in which a visitor relates the following history told by his NPS guide. Make sure you read about the Christmas dinner... First time I had seen that, but it is probably in Nettie Mudd Monroe's book, which I have not read in over 40 years.

"Mudd, an unapologetic slave owner, regarded himself as a martyr to Yankee tyranny. Engraved over the entrance to the casement where he lived is a quote from Dante’s “Inferno”: “Whoso Entereth Here Leaveth All Hopes Behind.” In his letters home, Mudd complained piteously of “degrading” punishment and “inhuman” conditions, citing among other things the shame of being guarded by black soldiers.

"In fact, according to our guide and “America’s Fortress,” apart from a brief period after he tried to escape, Mudd was not shackled. He was allowed to move freely around the fort, and to earn money for luxuries such as tobacco, foodstuffs and civilian clothing by making boxes and picture frames inlaid with sea shells that he sold to officers and visitors to the fort. One Christmas, Mudd wrote home that he had even dined on roast turkey, oysters, fresh peaches and other treats.

"The Union prisoners and their guards shared virtually all Mudd’s discomfort. The official rations were generally abysmal: Meat was often rancid, bread infested with bugs and the water with wriggling worms. Malaria, dysentery, cholera, sunstroke and other ailments were chronic. Isolation bred excruciating loneliness. Men went mad almost as a matter of course. As Harrison Herrick of the 110th New York noted in his diary, displayed in the museum, 'One of the guards, one of the Del. Artillery shot himself through the head. He was crazy. Wether fair and plesant.' [sic]"

Thanks to Laurie for sending this link:

https://forums.onlinebookclub.org/viewto...4&t=124701
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)