|
08-24-2019, 07:47 PM,
|
|
|
|
RE: Thomas Lincoln
I finished this today. It's a detailed, sympathetic biography of Thomas Lincoln, which takes issue with the notions that Thomas was shiftless and that he was hostile toward his son's desire to improve himself. It's worth reading for anyone interested in Lincoln's family, with the caveat that it was not well proofread. There was at least one instance in the printed version where a line or two of text was dropped, and the electronic version had such issues as well. The author also tends to repeat himself a bit; a more vigorous editing would have improved this.
|
|
|
|
08-25-2019, 12:36 PM,
|
|
|
|
RE: Thomas Lincoln
It was a rather dry read, more informative than pleasurable. There is a fair amount of genealogical information, but it's mixed in with the rest of the information. (What it doesn't have is a genealogical table, which would have been helpful.) I would guess (not going back and counting) that there's about 30 pages of endnotes, as well as 60 pages or so of back matter (appendices, photo credits bibliography, index).
|
|
|
|
02-22-2020, 07:19 PM,
|
|
|
|
RE: Thomas Lincoln
To my eye, a quick examination shows the shape, angle, and flow of the capital “T”s and “L”s in the above document are decidedly different from the “T”s and “L”s written on the photo. Notice particularly the word “Living” is written several times in the document. The the bottom of the “L” in each case flows directly into the following “i”. Whereas on the photo, there is a distinct break between the two letters when written consecutively in the word “Lincoln.”
|
|
|
|