04-11-2014, 07:03 PM,
(This post was last modified: 04-11-2014, 07:22 PM by Dr. Todd Descendant.)
|
|
|
RE: Booth's Body
(04-11-2014, 03:36 PM)Lincoln Wonk Wrote: I like this photo of a supposed Booth body exposition from the Hagley Museum and Library collection: http://digital.hagley.org/cdm/ref/collec...ll8/id/180
I'm sure the Booth family loved that. I wonder whose mummified remains were making the rounds in that exhibition.
(04-11-2014, 04:41 PM)Wild Bill Wrote: I recommend the R. B. Garrett Letter in the Ida Tarbell Collection that Rob Wick mentioned a few weeks ago on the body on the monitor. Garrett says it was Booth, no question about it.
As to the removed vertebrae--they were evidence?
I would think without the photographic evidence to support their origin, the vertebral pieces wouldn't be worth much from an evidentiary standpoint. Yes? How would those pieces prove anything? We live in a world of DNA evidence and such. One could truly get away with murder back then.
I've reread that news article from 1865 linked to early in this thread by me, and wonder not if the corpse on the deck was Booth, but whether the body being rowed out was his. Perhaps the government was concerned that some shifty folks might attempt to steal the body and - I don't know - take it around the carnival circuit? grin
|
|
|
|
04-11-2014, 09:35 PM,
|
|
|
RickBeaver
Member
  
|
Posts: 27
Threads: 1
Joined: Mar 2014
|
|
RE: Booth's Body
(04-11-2014, 04:03 PM)L Verge Wrote: We have actually had visitors to Surratt House in years past who had seen this "display" in the carnivals when it made the circuit. One gentleman said he paid 50 cents to see it; another paid 25 cents.
When I was a young boy, probably about 10 years old, I saw the "Booth Mummy" at a carnival in Rockwell, NC. I was with my dad and the display was something like a freak show or something of that nature
It looked a lot like the one we've seen so many pictures of on the internet. My dad told me is was probably a fake. That sparked my interest in the Lincoln Assassination.
I haven't heard from anyone else in this area that remembers that show coming through. When I read about this "mummy" it was usually displayed in the mid-west and I don't remember seeing anything about it being in the North Carolina area.
|
|
|
|
04-11-2014, 10:20 PM,
|
|
|
Houmes
Senior Member
   
|
Posts: 202
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: Booth's Body
(04-11-2014, 02:21 PM)RickBeaver Wrote: I've always wondered why the pieces of vertebrae were removed and kept.
On June 9, 1862, the U.S. Surgeon General's office issued a circular announcing an intent to publish a medical and surgical history of the war. Medical directors were instructed to send copies of their records to Dr. Joseph Janvier Woodward and surgical records were to be sent to Dr. John H. Brinton. The Surgeon General's office also planned the development of the Army Medical Museum, with the intent of improving medical and surgical care. The museum needed specimens with case reports to study. Specimens were often sent to Washington preserved in barrels of whiskey, and Dr. Brinton eventually went on an extended "collection" tour for more material. The museum began needing a large supply of alcohol, and the Washington police supplied them with confiscated brandy and liquors. Brinton is believed to have taken along a supply of both during his travels, with the brandy being an "incentive" for field officers to cooperate. Booth was captured by Federal troops, was autopsied by Federal surgeons, and there you have it.
|
|
|
|