Robert Todd Lincoln --The vitals
|
01-11-2018, 07:08 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-11-2018 07:17 PM by Anita.)
Post: #122
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Robert Todd Lincoln --The vitals
(01-10-2018 09:24 PM)ScholarInTraining Wrote:Scholar in Training, in post #121 you state " And to answer your question, he didn't seem to be an atheist at all. He believed in God - evidenced by quotes and letters and stuff - so I don't get why biographers got to calling him "nonreligious" among other things.(01-10-2018 07:01 PM)Eva Elisabeth Wrote: Thanks for your reply, Kerry. Yes, that is what I read, so I am curious as for the evidence Scholar in training thinks challenging to the biographers opinion. Kerry states in post #136 "Emerson cites correspondence between Lincoln scholars which resulted in agreement that Robert never joined a church and rarely mentioned religious faith or prayer." Eva replies to Kerry in post 138 "Thanks for your reply, Kerry. Yes, that is what I read, so I am curious as for the evidence Scholar in training thinks challenging to the biographers opinion." So Scholar in Training, why don't you just answer Eva's request for the quotes and letters to support your statement? Like Roger, I am also confused. Roger states in post #142 "Maybe I am missing something, but as far as I can tell, all Eva is asking is that examples from Robert's quotes and letters be posted to support this; I do not think she is being sarcastic - she is simply asking to see specific evidence of Robert's views on God." This is a forum, a community engaged in learning. We want to know about the quotes and letters you refer to so we can better understand the subject we're discussing. We are always open and eager to find new sources. Laurie, Speaking of Harvard and your post, I thought this interesting. From the "Crimson" http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1888/1...er-to-the/ Harvard's Reputation NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED January 26, 1888 In answer to the question "Why has Harvard so poor a reputation in the country at large," President Eliot said that, in his opinion, it was largely owing to religious grounds. Forty years ago Harvard was a sectarian college belonging to the Unitarians, who were then greatly disliked by other denominations. Although Harvard is no longer sectarian, religious hatred still makes men ready to believe anything bad which may be said of it, while they refuse to credit any representations to the contrary. Then, too, we have more rich men's son's here than any other college possesses, and rich men's sons are, as a rule, wild and extravagant, and by their actions tend to bring the whole college into disrepute. The chief reason, however, for our "bad eminence" is the readiness which the newspapers show to discredit all colleges, and Harvard, as the largest, gets the greatest share. There is a natural hostility between college-bred men and those who are "self-made," to which class belong the majority of journalists, and this enmity expends itself in spreading false rumors and injurious statements. The only thing that we can do is to live down this bad reputation by conducting ourselves properly as students and as graduates, and by spreading a know ledge of the true state of things whenever there is a chance. This way is already being taken, and we may be confident that we shall yet succeed completely. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)