|
11-19-2012, 08:46 PM,
|
|
|
|
Sic Semper Tyrannis - Revenge for the South
I have always wondered whether JWB - as an actor - had planned on shouting a statement when shooting the President, or if it was spontaneous.
Are there differing accounts as to what Booth shouted and when? Didn't Maj. Rathbone say that Booth has shouted something in the Presidential box?
I seem to recall reading from different sources that "Sic Sepmer Tyrannis" was the cry and also "Revenge for the South." Is there a consensus among historians as to whether both of those phrases were used? If so were both delivered from the stage during the escape?
|
|
|
11-20-2012, 10:14 AM,
(This post was last modified: 11-20-2012, 10:38 AM by JMadonna.)
|
|
|
JMadonna
Forum Master
    
|
Posts: 899
Threads: 17
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: Sic Semper Tyrannis - Revenge for the South
(11-19-2012, 09:47 PM)J. Beckert Wrote: You make me scratch my head a lot, Jerry! You don't think like the other kids here, do you? Very good point and one I've never thought of. I'm not sure I buy it, but it is an interesting alternative. Well if Booth was following the original kidnapping plot - one important aspect of it was to have someone backstage kill the lights to cover the escape. If he was expecting Spangler to perform the deed it would have caught him by surprise to find himself lit up on stage. Therefore, it's logical (to me) that he did what any actor would do when a screw-up occurs - he ad-libbed.
The line he used seemed appropriate to him for the situation but I don't think he planned for it to be debated over its deeper meaning. It was meant to freeze the audience that the play was still going on.
|
|
|
|
11-20-2012, 05:31 PM,
|
|
|
JMadonna
Forum Master
    
|
Posts: 899
Threads: 17
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: Sic Semper Tyrannis - Revenge for the South
(11-20-2012, 11:48 AM)J. Beckert Wrote: Turning off the gas was part of the plan when Booth planned to kidnap Lincoln which would have taken a lot more time that killing him. I don't see it being part of the plan at Ford's.
I agree that Booth's possible dual reasons for his statement are not mutually exclusive. That was very interesting, Jerry. That kind of thinking is what produces new angles on this.
Thanks Joe, I'm a mathematician by training so I guess I always think linearly. The shortest distance between 2 points is a straight line. When something doesn't follow the straight line, I find it fascinating to figure out why or what happened.
The fact that I called Booth's statement an ad-lib doesn't mean it wasn't pre-planned. I'm sure if Rathbone could have grabbed him he'd have said the same thing.
|
|
|
|