Baptist Alley and preservation
|
02-13-2013, 10:38 PM
Post: #16
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Baptist Alley and preservation
Joe - as far as I know it was dirt. The old cobbles may have been there, but don't really know; but I would think dirt since the main road was dirt. The cobbles seem to show up in the photo in Oldroyd's book I believe. In that case, then the cobbles were put down perhaps from 1870-1900....
But I believe it was dirt - "The Past is a foreign country...they do things differently there" - L. P. Hartley |
|||
02-14-2013, 05:38 AM
Post: #17
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Baptist Alley and preservation
(02-13-2013 09:36 PM)Jim Page Wrote:(02-13-2013 08:34 PM)L Verge Wrote: Be careful, Mr. Garrett, you look somewhat like the vagrants that used to panhandle near the restaurant years ago. Well.....the change did pay for the egg rolls. |
|||
02-14-2013, 05:55 AM
Post: #18
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Baptist Alley and preservation | |||
02-14-2013, 06:00 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-14-2013 06:00 AM by BettyO.)
Post: #19
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Baptist Alley and preservation
Notice the noose to the far right of the top of the photo!!!
"The Past is a foreign country...they do things differently there" - L. P. Hartley |
|||
02-14-2013, 06:02 AM
Post: #20
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Baptist Alley and preservation
Eerie!
|
|||
02-14-2013, 06:11 AM
Post: #21
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Baptist Alley and preservation | |||
02-14-2013, 07:26 AM
Post: #22
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Baptist Alley and preservation | |||
02-14-2013, 08:07 AM
Post: #23
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Baptist Alley and preservation
(02-14-2013 05:55 AM)RJNorton Wrote:(02-13-2013 07:38 PM)Jim Garrett Wrote: Likewise, the rats in the alley behind Surratt's are also direct descendants. :0 The noose is rather spooky, indeed! Bill Nash |
|||
02-14-2013, 08:26 AM
Post: #24
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Baptist Alley and preservation
Laurie, I want you to know that if I do win the Powerball lottery and manage to purchase 541 H and open Marry Surratts BnB I'm having as my first guests you and Betty O. There after dark we will consume canned oysters, brandy, and cigars as we play high stakes poker and hatch some sort of new plot (looking for ideas here as to just what plot).
|
|||
02-14-2013, 08:56 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-14-2013 09:15 AM by mgambuzza.)
Post: #25
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Baptist Alley and preservation
(02-13-2013 06:44 PM)L Verge Wrote: Mike and I have already exchanged e-mails on his dream, and I'm afraid that I was pessimistic also. First of all, there has been a great deal of money spent on revitalizing Chinatown ever since the big Verizon Center arena went in down the street. That has driven up the real estate costs tremendously. And, with the wide push for cultural diversity now, there would be a definite fight to preserve the Oriental flavor (sorry, bad pun) of the building since it is surrounded by similar buildings and restaurants. Laurie I couldn't agree with you more about leaving the alley (I love old alleys!) the way it was. You know, in our current society, many of us are in denial about our history and also about what it is to be human in some respects. For example, I discussed the opposition to preservation of 541H street as glorifying negative and dark periods in American history. Well, that was the history and you can't change it, might as well learn from it. I visited the Peterson house again after many years and was also disturbed to find that the bloody pillow previously covered in a plexicase cover was no longer there. I guess this was an attempt to "sterilize" the true horror of the assassination. Sometimes I think we are turning into what I've heard teremd the cupcake generation. Like you alluded to in your comment, 1865 DC was a rough and tumble place. It smelled and was dirty, people drank, visited brothels, fought, and killed. That was the reality. Now take away someones Starbucks coffee and cell phone and they won't know what to do! Good times! BTW: I also visited the new museum at Ford's and I thought they cleaned it up to and changed the focus away from the assassination and focused more on Lincolns's good works. It still is very good and I support the theater as it is near and dear to my heart. I couldn't find the old door to the box though! Best, Mike (02-13-2013 05:07 PM)asobbingfilm Wrote: True everyone has their price but you are overlooking the fact that that is their family business and IMHO $3million for purchase, relocation and restoration is probably very low considering the real estate and labor markets in DC. I would think the restoration alone might be 3-4 million (to really do it right). You are going to have to purchase the building AND relocate them as that is their cash cow. The Wok and Roll is a very hot spot in Chinatown, try getting a table during the lunch rush. Where would you move them? Spaces in DC are at a premium if you can find them. I would love to see them sell out but as you say if it can be done for 3 million, it probably would have already happened. Laurie Verge and others might have some thoughts on this so stay tuned to the thread. My guess is you are talking 10 million minimum with a capital M in minimum. A true historical restoration might present current bld code issues too, but Im no expert on that subject. I haven't eaten at Wok and Roll but the place a couple of doors down has some excellent spicy chicken with peanuts! (02-13-2013 08:00 PM)Jim Garrett Wrote: Nothing better than two middle-aged Jim's wandering around Chinatown slurping egg drop soup! Jim are you a descendant of the historic Garretts of Port Royal vicinity? Mike |
|||
02-14-2013, 10:37 AM
Post: #26
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Baptist Alley and preservation
Out of the many places involved with the assassination, the Surratt boardinghouse is one of the places I worry about the least. The building is in good shape and is a thriving business. If someone wins the lottery, I would rather they buy up Rich Hill or the Peyton House and restore those.
|
|||
02-14-2013, 10:51 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-14-2013 11:40 AM by BettyO.)
Post: #27
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Baptist Alley and preservation
If I win, I'd LOVE to buy Rich Hill, Dave -- plus it has acreage - IF I bought 541 H Street - it'd only be because Lew Powell stayed there!
I'd much rather have Rich Hill out in the country - "The Past is a foreign country...they do things differently there" - L. P. Hartley |
|||
02-14-2013, 11:08 AM
Post: #28
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Baptist Alley and preservation
Dave I'd have to stick with buying 541 H as Im a city guy at heart, but I understand that RH and Peyton are more in need.
|
|||
02-14-2013, 11:47 AM
Post: #29
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Baptist Alley and preservation
(02-13-2013 09:42 PM)J. Beckert Wrote: Welcome, Mike. There's a lot of knowledge and fun here. I hope you enjoy it. I never suggested that they were there in 1865 but you have to admit the cobblestones are much more in keeping with the old vs the black top. |
|||
02-14-2013, 01:55 PM
Post: #30
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Baptist Alley and preservation
Joan Chaconas (my D.C. history expert) and I discussed this alley question. There seems to be no rhyme nor reason as to what streets were "cared for" and which ones were left as dirt until after the Civil War. However, both of us are taking an educated guess that the cobblestones may well have been there - and we are basing this solely on the fact that the alley led to the back of a theater where props, lumber, etc. had to delivered; and adjacent was the back of an undertaking establishment where corpses and coffins were taken. It seems logical that sturdier pavement would be needed for heavier loads (not just horses), especially in the rainy season.
I believe there is a book about the alleys of Washington, but I don't know if it goes into their paving history. I really should read that book because I have always been interested in the stories of the alley dwellers. Some of the alleys have great names, like Louse Alley, Tin Cup Alley, Marble Alley, and Fighting Alley. Several of the 73 brothels of D.C. during the Civil War were listed as being in some of these alleys. In fact, one in Fighting Alley was owned by Margaret HANKS. She employed six "inmates," but the Provost Marshal's Office listed it as low class in their 1864-65 report. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)