|
12-29-2018, 11:54 AM,
|
|
|
RE: Who is this person?
(12-29-2018, 07:00 AM)Eva Elisabeth Wrote: Re.: "Restaurants in the 19th century in the U.S. routinely advertised 'private rooms for ladies' or 'private rooms for ladies and families'" - how many honorable ladies and families would you expect in that environment?
Plenty. Respectable ladies could, and did, travel without male companions, either out of necessity or for pleasure. I believe that trains also offered some all-ladies cars.
|
|
|
|
12-29-2018, 01:07 PM,
|
|
|
L Verge
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 9,092
Threads: 493
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: Who is this person?
(12-29-2018, 11:54 AM)Susan Higginbotham Wrote: (12-29-2018, 07:00 AM)Eva Elisabeth Wrote: Re.: "Restaurants in the 19th century in the U.S. routinely advertised 'private rooms for ladies' or 'private rooms for ladies and families'" - how many honorable ladies and families would you expect in that environment?
Plenty. Respectable ladies could, and did, travel without male companions, either out of necessity or for pleasure. I believe that trains also offered some all-ladies cars.
I agree with Susan. In fact, Surratt House has two dining rooms - a public one for gentlemen travelers and the family dining room. On the few occasions when a traveling female or several in a group or with children might be on one of the stagecoaches that stopped at Surratt House at meal time, those customers would be fed in the family's dining room.
The stage actually ran out of D.C. three days a week into the southern counties of Maryland (the economic backbone - except for Baltimore - of the state because of the antebellum slave system and the production of tobacco). The return trip to D.C. was made the other three days. Because of the gentry related to Southern Maryland since the colonial days, I suspect that some well-to-do ladies might well have eaten separately at the Surratts' establishment.
Just remember that "private rooms" did not always suggest extra entertainment. They were part of the culinary scene. There used to be a Japanese restaurant in Georgetown years ago that had side "rooms" separated from the main dining room by heavy drapes. Behind those drapes were just a table and chairs or a large booth.
|
|
|
12-29-2018, 01:09 PM,
(This post was last modified: 12-29-2018, 01:11 PM by Eva Elisabeth.)
|
|
|
Eva Elisabeth
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 6,598
Threads: 69
Joined: Apr 2013
|
|
RE: Who is this person?
(12-29-2018, 01:07 PM)L Verge Wrote: (12-29-2018, 11:54 AM)Susan Higginbotham Wrote: (12-29-2018, 07:00 AM)Eva Elisabeth Wrote: Re.: "Restaurants in the 19th century in the U.S. routinely advertised 'private rooms for ladies' or 'private rooms for ladies and families'" - how many honorable ladies and families would you expect in that environment?
Plenty. Respectable ladies could, and did, travel without male companions, either out of necessity or for pleasure. I believe that trains also offered some all-ladies cars.
I agree with Susan. In fact, Surratt House has two dining rooms - a public one for gentlemen travelers and the family dining room. On the few occasions when a traveling female or several in a group or with children might be on one of the stagecoaches that stopped at Surratt House at meal time, those customers would be fed in the family's dining room.
The stage actually ran out of D.C. three days a week into the southern counties of Maryland (the economic backbone - except for Baltimore - of the state because of the antebellum slave system and the production of tobacco). The return trip to D.C. was made the other three days. Because of the gentry related to Southern Maryland since the colonial days, I suspect that some well-to-do ladies might well have eaten separately at the Surratts' establishment.
Just remember that "private rooms" did not always suggest extra entertainment. They were part of the culinary scene. There used to be a Japanese restaurant in Georgetown years ago that had side "rooms" separated from the main dining room by heavy drapes. Behind those drapes were just a table and chairs or a large booth. Well, I referred to the ARCTIC in the 19th century. How many honorable ladies would you suspect to have gone there with their men? And why the need for beds and scales in the boxes/rooms?
|
|
|
12-29-2018, 01:27 PM,
(This post was last modified: 12-29-2018, 01:42 PM by L Verge.)
|
|
|
L Verge
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 9,092
Threads: 493
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: Who is this person?
(12-29-2018, 01:09 PM)Eva Elisabeth Wrote: (12-29-2018, 01:07 PM)L Verge Wrote: (12-29-2018, 11:54 AM)Susan Higginbotham Wrote: (12-29-2018, 07:00 AM)Eva Elisabeth Wrote: Re.: "Restaurants in the 19th century in the U.S. routinely advertised 'private rooms for ladies' or 'private rooms for ladies and families'" - how many honorable ladies and families would you expect in that environment?
Plenty. Respectable ladies could, and did, travel without male companions, either out of necessity or for pleasure. I believe that trains also offered some all-ladies cars.
I agree with Susan. In fact, Surratt House has two dining rooms - a public one for gentlemen travelers and the family dining room. On the few occasions when a traveling female or several in a group or with children might be on one of the stagecoaches that stopped at Surratt House at meal time, those customers would be fed in the family's dining room.
The stage actually ran out of D.C. three days a week into the southern counties of Maryland (the economic backbone - except for Baltimore - of the state because of the antebellum slave system and the production of tobacco). The return trip to D.C. was made the other three days. Because of the gentry related to Southern Maryland since the colonial days, I suspect that some well-to-do ladies might well have eaten separately at the Surratts' establishment.
Just remember that "private rooms" did not always suggest extra entertainment. They were part of the culinary scene. There used to be a Japanese restaurant in Georgetown years ago that had side "rooms" separated from the main dining room by heavy drapes. Behind those drapes were just a table and chairs or a large booth. Well, I referred to the ARCTIC in the 19th century. How many honorable ladies would you suspect to have gone there with their men? And why the need for beds and scales in the boxes/rooms?
Point taken. I would love to know how many females of any persuasion would have been in that region - gold or no gold. I would also suggest that "beds" were a selling point to those miners who had been roughing it and wanted a comfortable night's sleep. And, the wiki piece does say that the scales were for weighing the gold dust so that it wasn't a guessing game when it came to payment.
Start here if you are curious about the women of the Klondike gold rush: https://www.nps.gov/klgo/learn/historyculture/women.htm
OK - I'm hooked... https://scholarship.tricolib.brynmawr.ed...sAllowed=y
|
|
|
12-29-2018, 01:48 PM,
(This post was last modified: 12-29-2018, 02:03 PM by Eva Elisabeth.)
|
|
|
Eva Elisabeth
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 6,598
Threads: 69
Joined: Apr 2013
|
|
|
RE: Who is this person?
I meanwhile, too, tried to find statistics - just found books and articles that claimed some, yet only few women went there, a lot of whom were prostitutes. It makes sense to me as we all know human nature - away from civilization and in extreme situ many go back to instincts rather than moral and culture. Reminds me also of a student of my mother's, one of the laziest and most resistant to work. She happened to encounter him two years after graduation, he was just parking a Ferrari. She inquired as for his career - his graduation was right when the wall fell, and he headed to Dresden to open brothels, something that wasn't in former DDR. Market gap that made him rich.
Re. "And, the wiki piece does say that the scales were for weighing the gold dust so that it wasn't a guessing game when it came to payment." - Yes, but why scales and bed in each box?
|
|
|
|