Sgt. Harry H, Brogden
|
09-07-2012, 11:01 AM
Post: #13
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Sgt. Harry H, Brogden
I'm sure that Seward did still think he was better qualified to be President - even as late as 1863. However, wouldn't topics like keeping California in the Union and watching out for Brigham Young come under the purview of the State Department? Today, we think of it mainly as a foreign affairs post, but I think it encompasses the state of things in the Union also.
|
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Sgt. Harry H, Brogden - John Stanton - 08-31-2012, 09:34 PM
RE: Sgt. Harry H, Brogden - L Verge - 09-01-2012, 11:55 AM
RE: Sgt. Harry H, Brogden - John Stanton - 09-01-2012, 01:18 PM
RE: Sgt. Harry H, Brogden - L Verge - 09-01-2012, 05:08 PM
RE: Sgt. Harry H, Brogden - John Stanton - 09-01-2012, 10:06 PM
RE: Sgt. Harry H, Brogden - L Verge - 09-02-2012, 10:17 AM
RE: Sgt. Harry H, Brogden - John Stanton - 09-02-2012, 09:18 PM
RE: Sgt. Harry H, Brogden - L Verge - 09-03-2012, 11:21 AM
RE: Sgt. Harry H, Brogden - BettyO - 09-03-2012, 06:33 PM
RE: Sgt. Harry H, Brogden - HerbS - 09-06-2012, 01:58 PM
RE: Sgt. Harry H, Brogden - John Stanton - 09-06-2012, 10:28 PM
RE: Sgt. Harry H, Brogden - HerbS - 09-07-2012, 07:51 AM
RE: Sgt. Harry H, Brogden - Laurie Verge - 09-07-2012 11:01 AM
RE: Sgt. Harry H, Brogden - HerbS - 09-07-2012, 12:31 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)