Presidential security
11-26-2013, 08:53 AM,
#15
RE: Presidential security
Great thread! My question would be regarding Stanton's motive in dropping the charges against Parker. Also, did Stanton have the authority to even do this? I understand that martial law was the norm in the days following the assassination but Parker was a Washington City Police officer. Any charge as far as dereliction of duty goes should have been handled by his immediate superiors including A.C. Richards. To me the only way that Stanton should have become involved in the charges against Parker were if it was somehow believed that he had something to do with the conspiracy.

Roger, I have not read Griffin's book. Is he in the Eisenchimal camp?

Craig
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Presidential security - by Rhatkinson - 11-24-2013, 12:45 PM
RE: Presidential security - by Anita - 11-24-2013, 09:53 PM
RE: Presidential security - by RJNorton - 11-25-2013, 06:21 AM
RE: Presidential security - by BettyO - 11-25-2013, 07:04 AM
RE: Presidential security - by J. Beckert - 11-25-2013, 08:08 AM
RE: Presidential security - by Anita - 11-25-2013, 01:57 PM
RE: Presidential security - by richard petersen - 11-25-2013, 02:13 PM
RE: Presidential security - by RJNorton - 11-25-2013, 03:00 PM
RE: Presidential security - by L Verge - 11-25-2013, 03:05 PM
RE: Presidential security - by Anita - 11-25-2013, 07:39 PM
RE: Presidential security - by L Verge - 11-25-2013, 08:38 PM
RE: Presidential security - by Gene C - 11-25-2013, 08:40 PM
RE: Presidential security - by Anita - 11-25-2013, 10:05 PM
RE: Presidential security - by RJNorton - 11-26-2013, 05:56 AM
RE: Presidential security - by Craig Hipkins - 11-26-2013, 08:53 AM
RE: Presidential security - by RJNorton - 11-26-2013, 09:10 AM
RE: Presidential security - by Craig Hipkins - 11-26-2013, 09:29 AM
RE: Presidential security - by Gene C - 11-26-2013, 11:22 AM
RE: Presidential security - by Gene C - 11-26-2013, 01:25 PM
RE: Presidential security - by Craig Hipkins - 11-26-2013, 02:02 PM
RE: Presidential security - by L Verge - 11-26-2013, 02:20 PM
RE: Presidential security - by RJNorton - 11-26-2013, 03:08 PM
RE: Presidential security - by Gene C - 11-26-2013, 03:41 PM
RE: Presidential security - by A Clayton - 12-01-2014, 09:35 AM
RE: Presidential security - by Craig Hipkins - 11-26-2013, 03:00 PM
RE: Presidential security - by L Verge - 11-26-2013, 03:45 PM
RE: Presidential security - by J. Beckert - 11-26-2013, 05:38 PM
RE: Presidential security - by RJNorton - 11-26-2013, 05:47 PM
RE: Presidential security - by J. Beckert - 11-26-2013, 07:32 PM
RE: Presidential security - by Eva Elisabeth - 11-26-2013, 07:53 PM
RE: Presidential security - by L Verge - 11-26-2013, 08:04 PM
RE: Presidential security - by Gene C - 11-26-2013, 08:30 PM
RE: Presidential security - by J. Beckert - 11-26-2013, 08:37 PM
RE: Presidential security - by Anita - 11-26-2013, 08:49 PM
RE: Presidential security - by Eva Elisabeth - 11-26-2013, 10:47 PM
RE: Presidential security - by L Verge - 11-27-2013, 09:40 AM
RE: Presidential security - by J. Beckert - 11-27-2013, 10:01 AM
RE: Presidential security - by Gene C - 10-04-2014, 10:30 AM
RE: Presidential security - by L Verge - 10-04-2014, 01:16 PM
RE: Presidential security - by RJNorton - 10-04-2014, 01:33 PM
RE: Presidential security - by Jim Garrett - 10-11-2014, 08:23 AM
RE: Presidential security - by RJNorton - 12-01-2014, 09:56 AM
RE: Presidential security - by A Clayton - 12-01-2014, 10:12 AM
RE: Presidential security - by Linda Anderson - 12-01-2014, 05:35 PM
RE: Presidential security - by L Verge - 12-01-2014, 03:57 PM
RE: Presidential security - by Jim Woodall - 12-03-2014, 02:04 AM
RE: Presidential security - by A Clayton - 12-03-2014, 07:52 AM
RE: Presidential security - by L Verge - 12-03-2014, 12:01 PM
RE: Presidential security - by A Clayton - 12-03-2014, 02:36 PM
RE: Presidential security - by Jim Woodall - 12-04-2014, 07:57 AM
RE: Presidential security - by A Clayton - 12-04-2014, 08:27 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)