Lincoln Discussion Symposium / Lincoln Discussion Symposium / Assassination v / Presidential security

Post Reply 
Presidential security
11-25-2013, 07:08 AM
Post: #5
J. Beckert Offline
Legendary Member
******
 		Posts: 1,883
Joined: Jul 2012
RE: Presidential security
(11-25-2013 06:04 AM)BettyO Wrote:  I've never had much appreciation for Parker. Sure he was a cop - but obviously not a good one.

I agree. I don't think anyone makes excuses for Parker, but I don't buy the line that his function was to protect the White House and it's furnishings. That totally excuses him for a need at Ford's. He wasn't sent there to protect anything other than the President. Booth would have gotten by him one way or the other, but his absense speaks to his character and his dismal record shows he had none.
"There are few subjects that ignite more casual, uninformed bigotry and condescension from elites in this nation more than Dixie - Jonah Goldberg"
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Presidential security - Rhatkinson - 11-24-2013, 11:45 AM
RE: Presidential security - Anita - 11-24-2013, 08:53 PM
RE: Presidential security - RJNorton - 11-25-2013, 05:21 AM
RE: Presidential security - BettyO - 11-25-2013, 06:04 AM
RE: Presidential security - J. Beckert - 11-25-2013 07:08 AM
RE: Presidential security - Anita - 11-25-2013, 12:57 PM
RE: Presidential security - RJNorton - 11-25-2013, 02:00 PM
RE: Presidential security - L Verge - 11-25-2013, 02:05 PM
RE: Presidential security - Anita - 11-25-2013, 06:39 PM
RE: Presidential security - L Verge - 11-25-2013, 07:38 PM
RE: Presidential security - Gene C - 11-25-2013, 07:40 PM
RE: Presidential security - Anita - 11-25-2013, 09:05 PM
RE: Presidential security - RJNorton - 11-26-2013, 04:56 AM
RE: Presidential security - Craig Hipkins - 11-26-2013, 07:53 AM
RE: Presidential security - RJNorton - 11-26-2013, 08:10 AM
RE: Presidential security - Craig Hipkins - 11-26-2013, 08:29 AM
RE: Presidential security - Gene C - 11-26-2013, 10:22 AM
RE: Presidential security - Gene C - 11-26-2013, 12:25 PM
RE: Presidential security - Craig Hipkins - 11-26-2013, 01:02 PM
RE: Presidential security - L Verge - 11-26-2013, 01:20 PM
RE: Presidential security - RJNorton - 11-26-2013, 02:08 PM
RE: Presidential security - Gene C - 11-26-2013, 02:41 PM
RE: Presidential security - A Clayton - 12-01-2014, 08:35 AM
RE: Presidential security - Craig Hipkins - 11-26-2013, 02:00 PM
RE: Presidential security - L Verge - 11-26-2013, 02:45 PM
RE: Presidential security - J. Beckert - 11-26-2013, 04:38 PM
RE: Presidential security - RJNorton - 11-26-2013, 04:47 PM
RE: Presidential security - J. Beckert - 11-26-2013, 06:32 PM
RE: Presidential security - Eva Elisabeth - 11-26-2013, 06:53 PM
RE: Presidential security - L Verge - 11-26-2013, 07:04 PM
RE: Presidential security - Gene C - 11-26-2013, 07:30 PM
RE: Presidential security - J. Beckert - 11-26-2013, 07:37 PM
RE: Presidential security - Anita - 11-26-2013, 07:49 PM
RE: Presidential security - Eva Elisabeth - 11-26-2013, 09:47 PM
RE: Presidential security - L Verge - 11-27-2013, 08:40 AM
RE: Presidential security - J. Beckert - 11-27-2013, 09:01 AM
RE: Presidential security - Gene C - 10-04-2014, 09:30 AM
RE: Presidential security - L Verge - 10-04-2014, 12:16 PM
RE: Presidential security - RJNorton - 10-04-2014, 12:33 PM
RE: Presidential security - Jim Garrett - 10-11-2014, 07:23 AM
RE: Presidential security - RJNorton - 12-01-2014, 08:56 AM
RE: Presidential security - A Clayton - 12-01-2014, 09:12 AM
RE: Presidential security - Linda Anderson - 12-01-2014, 04:35 PM
RE: Presidential security - L Verge - 12-01-2014, 02:57 PM
RE: Presidential security - Jim Woodall - 12-03-2014, 01:04 AM
RE: Presidential security - A Clayton - 12-03-2014, 06:52 AM
RE: Presidential security - L Verge - 12-03-2014, 11:01 AM
RE: Presidential security - A Clayton - 12-03-2014, 01:36 PM
RE: Presidential security - Jim Woodall - 12-04-2014, 06:57 AM
RE: Presidential security - A Clayton - 12-04-2014, 07:27 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 11 Guest(s)

Contact Us | Lincoln Discussion Symposium | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication