Herold and Surratt
|
11-06-2013, 09:53 PM
Post: #39
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Herold and Surratt
I wish I could argue convincingly. By saying that I admit I can't.
We are all handicapped, because everything we read about assassination has been provided to us by the people who lived in 1865, who were as uninformed as we are today. They were either trying to distance themselves from Booth, or were trying to convict the assassins friends - as directed by the government. We believe Atzerodt, when his remarks seem to "prove" our position and then laugh at the poor soul when his remarks are contrary to what we want to believe. The same can be said about Weichmann and all the others. (Our Posts are too small to write in detail about all of them. Then there is the tendency to use good information, erroneously, to make a point. See: Did Surratt and Booth not go to NY after the Campbell Hospital "failure"?NO, they did not. Booth went to NY, and Surratt went to Richmond. See: Did Surratt not stop in NY to see Booth? Yes he did, but Booth was not there. See: Did not Surratt send a telegram to Booth from Elmira? OOPS! Surratt is in ELMIRA. Fact: Booth and Surratt never met again,in their lifetime, after the "failure". My conclusion is: If Surratt was still a member of the assassination team, he would have made himself available, and would have been effective. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)