Throwing more Mudd in the game
|
09-25-2013, 07:58 AM
Post: #18
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Throwing more Mudd in the game
(09-23-2013 12:41 PM)RJNorton Wrote: I am trusting George Atzerodt's word with this post. Roger: I have always had a problem with Atzerodt's statement, which was a summary of a two hour grilling. The parenthetical "(as he told me)" appears to be McPhail's way of emphasizing that Atzerodt's liquor and provisions statement was not first-hand information. It has never made sense to me that Booth would have sent provisions for a trip to Richmond two weeks before the assassination. Booth read the Washington papers. He knew that Richmond was surrounded and about to fall, which happened on April 3rd. You asked if Booth and Herold left Dr. Mudd's with any "extra stuff." I think you refer to the "liquor and provisions." If liquor and provisions were sent to Dr. Mudd, he clearly didn't give them to Booth, since shortly after Booth left Dr. Mudd's he asked Swan for liquor and food. General Ewing brought Atzerodt's statement to President Johnson's attention in his post-trial appeal letter, as evidence of Dr. Mudd's innocence. I have elaborated on all this at: http://www.samuelmudd.com/511865-atzerod...ement.html Regarding Nancy Tilly, the nanny or nurse for the Mudd children, I remember trying to find out more about her several years ago when I first read Mrs. Mudd's interview, but there is no Nancy Tilly in Maryland in any of the census or other historical records I looked at. Mrs. Mudd's interview was in 1909, almost a half century after the assassination, so her accurate memory of the young woman's name may have been faulty. - Bob |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)