|
08-25-2013, 02:32 PM,
|
|
|
Eva Elisabeth
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 6,598
Threads: 69
Joined: Apr 2013
|
|
|
RE: Did Mary Lincoln need committal?
If the following questions have already been discussed or answered, I apologize. I have checked some, but not all respective threads and posts.
1.) Does a court transcript or something smilar exist, which states in original wording what Mary Lincoln was accused of in the 1875 trial?
2.) On July 3, 1873, Orville Browning wrote in his diary about the following conversation with David Davis:
"At breakfast I took a seat by Judge Davis...I referred to Mrs. Lincoln; spoke of her unhappy and ungovernable temper, but added that great injustice had been done her; that her faults had been exaggerated, and that I believed that all the charges against her of having pilfered from the White House were false. The Judge replied that the proofs were too many and too strong against her to admit of her guilt; that she was a natural born thief; that stealing was a sort of insanity with her, and that she was carried away, from the White House, many things that were of no value to her after she had taken them, and that she had carried them away only in obedience to her irresistible propensity to steal."
Davis' statement, especially for a judge, is a hard judgement; without any proof I would call it a serious case of slander. I suppose he refers to the investigations against Mary by the Commitee on House Approbations in 1866, but I have always thought they came up empty. So, what proofs might Davis have referred to? Did Mary really steal any White House property?
|
|
|
08-25-2013, 07:27 PM,
(This post was last modified: 08-25-2013, 10:10 PM by Eva Elisabeth.)
|
|
|
Eva Elisabeth
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 6,598
Threads: 69
Joined: Apr 2013
|
|
RE: Did Mary Lincoln need committal?
Thank you, Roger. These documents are interesting. It seems one doctor's opinion indeed had been sufficient (since there is obviously no other written medical expert assessment) to determine her fate. And obviously many fates were tried that way, regarding the printed form.
I forgot one question:
3.) Who initiated the investigations? Was it still Thaddeus Stevens (since the Committee on House Appropriations rooted in the Committee on Ways and Means)?
(08-25-2013, 07:11 PM)Gene C Wrote: I don't know about alleged stealing from the White House, but as First Lady, she had run up considerable debt. She was extemely worried about having enough money, and in later years worried Robert was taking her money away from her. The following announcement appeared in the "Springfield Journal" in fall 1867:
"Hon. Davis David, administrator of the estate of the late President Lincoln, made a final settlement of the estate...After paying all debts and expenses, there remains the sum of $110;295.90...Since the death of the President, Mrs. Lincoln has received from the estate $4,085.51, Robert Lincoln $7,300.15..."
Thus, until then Robert had taken nearly twice as much.
|
|
|
08-26-2013, 09:35 PM,
(This post was last modified: 08-26-2013, 09:35 PM by Anita.)
|
|
|
Anita
Legendary Member
     
|
Posts: 1,616
Threads: 94
Joined: Jul 2013
|
|
|
RE: Did Mary Lincoln need committal?
Thanks to all who posted here. There are so many issues that touch upon this topic.
In the formal application that Robert filed he stated that his mother, "Mary Lincoln, widow of Abraham Lincoln, deceased, a resident of
Cook county is insane and that it would be for her benefit and for the safety of the community that she should be confined in the Cook County Hospital or the Illinois State Hospital for the Insane."
Did Mary have legal counsel? Was it proved that she was a danger to the community?
Did Robert ask the Edwards if they could care for Mary before he resorted to having her committed?
I don't think there's any doubt Mary needed looking after, but Robert could have handled it better. In the same way Lincoln handled Mary after Willie's death, did he say "mother, if you don't get a grip you'll leave me no choice but to do what I think is best for you which is to confine you for treatment so you can get better."
He could have met her at the hotel and taken her to the courthouse instead of ambushing her there.
But that's what I like to think I would have done. Robert did the best he could given the times, circumstances and who he was.
As for the autopsy, were they routinely done in those days? I don't believe Mary's family would have consented to it, especially Robert.
|
|
|
|