Proposed Virginia Legislation Revising History

[David Lockmiller]

Of all the paragraphs in a bill to ban “divisive concepts” from being taught in Virginia public schools, Section B3 may seem the most innocuous. After all, it is in the part of the proposal that defined what could actually be taught in history classes, not the myriad things that would be banned or the consequences teachers could face for teaching them, including prosecution and being fired.

Section B3 of the bill, sponsored by Republican freshman Del. Wren Williams, defines what can be taught as “the founding documents,” like the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, excerpts from the Federalist Papers, the writings of the Founding Fathers and Alexis de Tocqueville’s classic “Democracy in America.” Oh, and one more thing: “the first debate between Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass.”

It is a clear reference to the famed Lincoln-Douglas debates, one of the high points in this country’s intellectual, moral and civic history, but there’s just one problem: Lincoln did not debate Frederick Douglass.

[GustD45]

It is clear this person didn't do due diligence when he wrote out this portion of his proposal. Wren Williams and his staff need to either go back to school or sit down and keep their mouths shut.

Ok I'm off my soapbox now, sorry

[AussieMick]

It would be interesting to know how many people that refer to Democracy in America have actually read it.

[LincolnMan]

Well that’s the proverbial egg on one’s face!

[David Lockmiller]

(01-16-2022 09:21 AM)LincolnMan Wrote:  Well that’s the proverbial egg on one’s face!

I saw something this morning on Sunday Morning (?) in which Lyndon Johnson was asked about accepting legitimate public criticism.

He said it was "like being a mule in a hailstorm, you just have to stand there and take it."