10-02-2017, 12:58 AM,
(This post was last modified: 10-02-2017, 01:59 PM by Steve.)
|
|
|
Steve
Legendary Member
     
|
Posts: 1,670
Threads: 139
Joined: Jan 2017
|
|
RE: Does anyone know...?
(09-19-2017, 03:17 AM)John Fazio Wrote: Everyone:
There are stumbling blocks, true. That's nothing new.
Gene, I believe it more likely that Booth, Herold and Atzerodt were that stupid. I also believe it likely that she had the date wrong ("As near as I can recollect, between the 12th and the 15th of April"). I can place Booth and Herold together then, but not Atzerodt, who does not appear to have joined the conspiracy earlier than the winter of 1864-1865.
Steve, it is possible that Booth was in Washington while en route from New Orleans to Boston, but I doubt it. More likely is it that Mrs. McClermont erred with respect to the date. She was, after all, recalling an event that occurred about some years earlier. Your point about John Surratt not being mentioned in her testimony is a good one. It most likely accounts for the fact that she was not cross examined.
Susan, the fact that defense counsel did not cross-examine her could not have had anything to do with their believing her testimony was "so improbable". If they believed that, they would have been salivating like a starving pit bull to get at her. Further, the reference to the Soldiers' Home is ambiguous; we can't be certain she was talking about Lincoln's being there at that time, as opposed to being there at various times, which fact was known to the conspirators. I agree with you that she most likely meant a date in the spring of 1865 rather than 1864, at which time the three conspirators named are known to have been together and in gear. If that is true, it would explain why she hadn't been heard from before the trial. There may have been other reasons she failed to come forth with her story until 1867. One can speculate, but little if anything is gained by so doing.
In my judgment, the equities favor credibility, but there are problems, unquestionably.
John
I was just thinking over Mrs. McClermont's testimony. Ignore the problematic identifications from at least a year before the assassination and assume that she was mistaken about when she overheard the conversation and it was closer to the summer of 1864 when it would be more likely that Lincoln's family would be at Soldiers' Home. There was an incident that sort of matches what she described. In August 1864, some unknown person took a shot at Lincoln as he was riding up to Soldiers' Home. That seems to match closely with what she testified, about a "telescopic riffle".
|
|
|
10-20-2017, 06:30 PM,
(This post was last modified: 10-20-2017, 07:44 PM by Steve.)
|
|
|
Steve
Legendary Member
     
|
Posts: 1,670
Threads: 139
Joined: Jan 2017
|
|
RE: Does anyone know...?
I found this blog post about Edward Oaksmith's mother, Elizabeth Oakes Smith that has some information on Edward:
http://lorenelizabethchristie.blogspot.c...fe-in.html
and her papers at the University of Virginia:
https://ead.lib.virginia.edu/vivaxtf/vie...u03614.xml
Apparently, even though Elizabeth was a Unionist and opponent of slavery there was an effort to paint her as a southern sympathizer at the time of her death. The "anecdote" of son Edward possibly being a member of the conspiracy probably arises from that. I can find no mention of it before the 1890's. Elizabeth did have a son, Appleton Oaksmith who did support the Confederacy as a blockade runner, was caught and then escaped from a Boston prison in 1862 and fled to London.
Here's a link to a brief 1880 bio of Edward Oaksmith:
https://books.google.com/books?id=g2lsPj...22&f=false
He translated the play Narcisse from the German in 1863. He also apparently was an artist:
http://figure-drawings.blogspot.com/2009...-feet.html
and
http://nyeandcompany.com/auctions/70/a-c...ry-98.html
|
|
|
|
10-20-2017, 07:52 PM,
|
|
|
L Verge
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 9,092
Threads: 493
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: Does anyone know...?
(10-20-2017, 06:30 PM)Steve Wrote: I found this blog post about Edward Oaksmith's mother, Elizabeth Oakes Smith that has some information on Edward:
http://lorenelizabethchristie.blogspot.c...fe-in.html
and her papers at the University of Virginia:
https://ead.lib.virginia.edu/vivaxtf/vie...u03614.xml
Apparently, even though Elizabeth was a Unionist and opponent of slavery there was an effort to paint her as a southern sympathizer at the time of her death. The "anecdote" of son Edward possibly being a member of the conspiracy probably arises from that. I can find no mention of it before the 1890's. Elizabeth did have a son, Appleton Oaksmith who did support the Confederacy as a blockade runner, was caught and then escaped from a Boston prison in 1862 and fled to London.
Here's a link to a brief 1880 bio of Edward Oaksmith:
https://books.google.com/books?id=g2lsPj...22&f=false
He translated the play Narcisse from the German in 1863. He also apparently was an artist:
http://figure-drawings.blogspot.com/2009...-feet.html
and
http://nyeandcompany.com/auctions/70/a-c...ry-98.html
WOW, once again, Steve. Thanks so much, and I am forwarding this to the inquirer.
|
|
|
|