09-09-2012, 12:48 PM,
(This post was last modified: 09-09-2012, 09:21 PM by Rob Wick.)
|
|
|
Rob Wick
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 3,038
Threads: 196
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
|
Abraham Lincoln: A Third Party Candidate?
From Bill Moyers:
Abraham Lincoln — who ran as a Republican during the era of Whigs and Democrats — was America’s last third-party candidate to successfully win the presidency.
There is something about this that really bothers me. The Whig Party in America was, for all practical purposes, dead in 1856 (it started the death rattle in 1852), a full four years before Lincoln was elected. Lincoln, for all practical purposes, ceased to be a Whig in 1852. If any party was a third party, it was likely to be Whigs, or the Constitutional Union Party which it became in the north in 1860.
So is Moyers right? Were the Whigs enough of a political force in the 1860s to justify his comment that the Republicans were, in reality, a third party? I don't think so.
Best
Rob
Abraham Lincoln is the only man, dead or alive, with whom I could have spent five years without one hour of boredom.--Ida M. Tarbell
I want the respect of intelligent men, but I will choose for myself the intelligent.
--Carl Sandburg
|
|
|
|
09-10-2012, 04:26 PM,
|
|
|
Joe Di Cola
Forum Master
    
|
Posts: 591
Threads: 25
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: Abraham Lincoln: A Third Party Candidate?
(09-09-2012, 12:48 PM)Rob Wick Wrote: From Bill Moyers:
Abraham Lincoln — who ran as a Republican during the era of Whigs and Democrats — was America’s last third-party candidate to successfully win the presidency.
There is something about this that really bothers me. The Whig Party in America was, for all practical purposes, dead in 1856 (it started the death rattle in 1852), a full four years before Lincoln was elected. Lincoln, for all practical purposes, ceased to be a Whig in 1852. If any party was a third party, it was likely to be Whigs, or the Constitutional Union Party which it became in the north in 1860.
So is Moyers right? Were the Whigs enough of a political force in the 1860s to justify his comment that the Republicans were, in reality, a third party? I don't think so.
Best
Rob Rob,
The Whigs were essentially "dead" by 1856. This was partly due to their refusal to nominate Millard Fillmore to be their party standard in 1852--instead, nominating Winfield Scott. Fillmore was the last Whig president. Most Whigs ended up joining the Republican party. In 1856 the Republicans had their own presidential candidate in John C. Fremont, so it is fair to say that by 1860, the Republicans could hardly be deemed a third party. If anything in the 1860 election, the Consitutional Union party and its nominee John Bell were the 3rd party. This is at least my take on things.
What do you think about this?
Joe
|
|
|
09-10-2012, 04:53 PM,
(This post was last modified: 09-10-2012, 04:53 PM by Rob Wick.)
|
|
|
Rob Wick
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 3,038
Threads: 196
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: Abraham Lincoln: A Third Party Candidate?
I have to agree with you on that, Joe.
I'm really not sure I understand how Moyers reached this conclusion. He used it to introduce a story on third party candidates in history, but in the slideshow doesn't mention Lincoln (at least not that I saw).
Best
Rob
Abraham Lincoln is the only man, dead or alive, with whom I could have spent five years without one hour of boredom.--Ida M. Tarbell
I want the respect of intelligent men, but I will choose for myself the intelligent.
--Carl Sandburg
|
|
|
|