Post Reply 
Booth's Denial of Foreknowledge of the Attack on Seward
12-28-2018, 09:01 PM
Post: #15
RE: Booth's Denial of Foreknowledge of the Attack on Seward
Like you, John, I hope that Mr. G. will register for at least the six sessions of the Surratt conference in April. I believe that Judge Prindle's assessment of Booth's ties to the Confederacy, Barry Sheehy's talk on what was really going on in Montreal, Ed Steers's judgments on the trickery of Ray Neff and Len Guttridge, Dave Goetz's research on Mosby's ties to the conspiracy, Richard Willing's thoughts on the court's trials and tribulations on finding out "who done it," and finally the clean-up hitter, John Fazio, reminding us of what happens when you get on a government's last nerve and black flag warfare comes into play might enlighten Doubting Thomas.

BTW: Did y'all notice that he switched topics after being taken down over his Seward analysis. Do we see a trend that just keeps growing here? "Oops, my bad! Let's move on to something else to speculate on..."
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Booth's Denial of Foreknowledge of the Attack on Seward - L Verge - 12-28-2018 09:01 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)