Unwanted Facts: Facts that Most Books on the Lincoln Assassination Ignore

[Gene C]

(12-02-2018 08:06 AM)mikegriffith1 Wrote:  

(12-01-2018 08:04 PM)Gene C Wrote:  On the bottom of the 27th page of the report: "As a result of the complete examination of the diary, no invisible writings, no unusual obliterations or alterations or any characteristics of question were found."

So taking 86 pages, roughly half of the total pages, from the diary was a routine, ordinary alteration?!

You are taking this statement out of context. Remember that the FBI was asked to check for signs of invisible writing and to determine if any of the handwriting was forged, i.e., if any of the handwriting was not Booth's handwriting. "No unusual obliterations or alterations or characteristics of question were found" applies to the two purposes for which the FBI was asked to examine the diary, i.e., invisible writing and determining authorship. IOW, none of the obliterations or alterations cast any doubt on the authorship of the diary.

Seems to me you are the one taking things out of context again, by trying to make the FBI report say something it doesn't, as you demonstrate in your lengthy commentary.