Why should the 166th Ohio regiment be considered famous?
|
07-15-2025, 05:45 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Why should the 166th Ohio regiment be considered famous?
I have been truly surprised by the number of attempted guesses thus far - a grand total of zero.
President Lincoln made a speech to these soldiers as they departed service to their country as a regiment of soldiers. As far as I know, this is the only detailed documented speech by President Lincoln of this nature. And, this is despite the fact that he began his speech that day to the soldiers with these words: "I almost always feel inclined, when I say anything to soldiers, to impress upon them, in a few brief remarks, the importance of success in this contest." As some members of the Lincoln Discussion Symposium may remember, the speech was made the day before President Lincoln asked the members of his cabinet to sign the "Blind Memorandum" on August 23, 1864. It must certainly have been a low point in his own morale. But it was an important speech about the importance of democracy. The speech to these departing military service members is as follows: SOLDIERS--I suppose you are going home to see your families and friends. For the services you have done in this great struggle in which we are engaged, I present you sincere thanks for myself and the country. I almost always feel inclined, when I say anything to soldiers, to impress upon them, in a few brief remarks, the importance of success in this contest. It is not merely for the day, but for all time to come, that we should perpetuate for our children's children that great and free government which we have enjoyed all our lives. I beg you to remember this, not merely for my sake, but for yours. I happen, temporarily, to occupy this big White House. I am a living witness that any one of your children may look to come here as my father's child has. It is in order that each one of you may have, through this free government which we have enjoyed, an open field, and a fair chance for your industry, enterprise, and intelligence; that you may all have equal privileges in the race of life with all its desirable human aspirations--it is for this that the struggle should be maintained, that we may not lose our birthrights--not only for one, but for two or three years, if necessary. The nation is worth fighting for, to secure such an inestimable jewel. As noted on another thread: Fred Borch is a lawyer and historian. He was Professor of Legal History and Leadership at The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School for 18 years. He noted: When Lincoln was born in 1809, the United States was only 22 years old—the Constitution having been ratified in 1788. There were still Americans living who had fought in the Revolution—and Lincoln knew them or knew of them. These revolutionaries had witnessed the creation of a new system of government based not on kings, queens, and aristocrats but on the idea that men could rule themselves with a system of laws. To Lincoln and his contemporaries, America was a unique experiment—a republic based on a constitution with a president, congress, and judiciary. Had the southern states been allowed to leave the Union to create a slave-based Confederacy, the Union would have been shattered. Lincoln’s great achievement was preserving the Union—as he lived among the Americans who had been a part of the Revolution, understood what it had achieved, and did not want to see it destroyed. "So very difficult a matter is it to trace and find out the truth of anything by history." -- Plutarch |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Why should the 166th Ohio regiment be considered famous? - David Lockmiller - 07-14-2025, 10:00 AM
RE: Why should the 166th Ohio regiment be considered famous? - David Lockmiller - 07-15-2025 05:45 AM
RE: Why should the 166th Ohio regiment be considered famous? - STS Lincolnite - 07-16-2025, 12:59 PM
RE: Why should the 166th Ohio regiment be considered famous? - David Lockmiller - 07-16-2025, 10:29 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)