Conservative Majority Seems Ready to Limit Election Case Against Trump

[David Lockmiller]

"adding that the prospect of criminal prosecution would make that less likely."

So .... because an election is needed in a democracy, if the loser not only challenges the result and asserts the winner cheated without any real evidence that's OK.... indeed more than OK because it strengthens democracy?

And it's OK for the loser to encourage, or at least sit back and say nothing, when a mob attacks the seat of Government?

This assumes I've correctly interpreted the above .

As long as three other Justices of the United States Supreme Court agree with Justices Alito and Thomas by the end of June (term of the Supreme Court), perverted logic will be the law of the land. . . . "Next case!"