The Great Climate Migration Has Begun

[My Name Is Kate]

(07-27-2020 04:22 PM)Eva Elisabeth Wrote:  "Man needs nature, but nature doesn't need man."

Nature is not superior to man. Nature is not even conscious of itself. Nature did not create man, though man is a part of nature. It doesn't make sense to say that nature doesn't need man. Nature has no goals, other than the natural laws governing it. Laws imply a Lawgiver. It would make more sense to say that animals (some of them) don't need man and would be better off without him. But if man is the worst problem this world has ever seen, why does he exist? More specifically, why was he created? Something that is not conscious of itself and has no morality (nature, or any of its building blocks) cannot be responsible for the existence of something that is conscious of itself and is a moral being (or should be.)