Mary Lincoln for the Ages

[Gene C]

(01-30-2020 12:26 PM)Rob Wick Wrote:  I think Jason has a valid point. Many people, including some here, seem to believe that Michael Burlingame is somehow guilty of misogyny in his interpretation of Mary, yet no one can ever point to any substantial evidence other than their own bias. While Donna's point about female historians is well-taken (and all too true at times), one must admit that bias, especially where Mary is concerned, is not a one-way street.

Best
Rob

Well, that's your opinion


Rob and I like to pick at each other sometimes

So If someone doesn't admit they are biased, that means they're biased?
If someone admits to being biased, are they still biased.
And what about Misterogony?