Lincoln's Spies
|
08-03-2019, 06:26 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-03-2019 06:30 PM by L Verge.)
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Lincoln's Spies
(08-03-2019 04:46 PM)Gene C Wrote: I'd be interested in reading about Baker and Van Lew, but I'm not sure I want to bad enough to buy the book. I am hoping that we can get a good enough wholesale price from the publisher to be able to lower the cost a tad. However, $35 is not that high a price for a hardback with jacket, nearly 500 pages, and authored by a reputable, award-winning journalist/author. Anybody remember what O'Reilly's attempt at Killing Lincoln retailed for? Speaking of high prices -- I have home delivery from the grocery store because I can no longer walk through one. Today, I had a delivery and thought I had ordered one pound of apricots. Nope, it turned out that I only ordered one, and it cost $1.07. It was very tasty and sweet, but not for over a dollar. I have given up on cucumbers this summer because the last time I checked, one was selling for $1.69. Boy, do I miss my backyard garden where, during July and August I was harvesting lots of cucumbers and making pickles, lots of tomatoes for sauce, and lots of beans for freezing... (08-03-2019 11:21 AM)L Verge Wrote:(08-03-2019 03:41 AM)Steve Wrote:(08-02-2019 08:10 PM)L Verge Wrote: As I posted elsewhere, the book has bios on four spies - Pinkerton (who affected McClellan's military strategy with inflated info), George Sharpe (who was pretty much the father of what we now term military intelligence), Lafayette Baker (an early version of the Gestapo, imo), and Elizabeth Van Lew of Richmond. I got about 20 pages read this morning before I got an emergency call from work and had to go in for the rest of the day. The first chapter is a bio of Pinkerton, and there is mention of his working for the Illinois Central Railroad and Lincoln being the lawyer for the company and drawing up his security agreement and being impressed with Pinkerton. The author says there is no mention of what Pinkerton thought of Lincoln. This seems to imply that the two met previous to 1860, but I don't see concrete proof. I can be impressed with someone while reading their credentials and not even meeting them. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Lincoln's Spies - Steve - 08-02-2019, 04:10 PM
RE: Lincoln's Spies - L Verge - 08-02-2019, 07:17 PM
RE: Lincoln's Spies - Rob Wick - 08-02-2019, 07:34 PM
RE: Lincoln's Spies - Steve - 08-02-2019, 07:59 PM
RE: Lincoln's Spies - L Verge - 08-02-2019, 08:10 PM
RE: Lincoln's Spies - Steve - 08-03-2019, 03:41 AM
RE: Lincoln's Spies - L Verge - 08-03-2019, 11:21 AM
RE: Lincoln's Spies - RJNorton - 08-04-2019, 04:08 AM
RE: Lincoln's Spies - Gene C - 08-03-2019, 04:46 PM
RE: Lincoln's Spies - L Verge - 08-03-2019 06:26 PM
RE: Lincoln's Spies - L Verge - 08-14-2019, 08:41 PM
RE: Lincoln's Spies - L Verge - 08-23-2019, 07:29 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)