I’m not offended!

[David Lockmiller]

(07-08-2019 09:41 AM)My Name Is Kate Wrote:  My point is that the public was deliberately misled by ignoring an important part of what transpired during the incident. We can only hope that the court, jury, and judge were not as biased as the media.

Why is it that in this case you side with jury, judge and justice system, but you are full of doubts and criticism in the Gallagher trial and verdict?

The doubts and criticisms were reported by the New York Times. I just did a copy and paste from three stories.

In totality, I think that it shows that the top levels of the military wanted the outcome that was achieved.

Why do you think that the trial was not brought to a complete standstill while the possibility of perjury by the medic who claimed he actually committed the murder of the prisoner was investigated?

Do you really believe that this medic will be tried for murder by the military? You do realize that his defense would be that he murdered the teenager because the Iraq soldiers would have tortured and then murdered him. So, his murder of the boy was an act of kindness.

We'll just have to wait for medic's murder trial to find out the "truth," won't we?