Seed Pearl Necklace and Bracelets

[Anita]

(06-09-2019 03:51 PM)James Wrote:  Have you received the ransom money yet, Anita? How about the message I sent along with it? No on both counts? I'm not surprised. Sometimes a glitch occurs during the delivery process, but it will get there eventually. First things first.
Do you know what "taken out of context means", Anita? That would be when somebody (you) takes the last sentence from a one thousand - two hundred and eighty word explanatory body of work and then proceeds to attack the final sentence with the following; "When there is major disagreement by viewers of your dag that it isn't Mary and Abraham Lincoln that's portrayed, it is your responsibility to produce additional documentation to support your claim. The image itself is not enough. Remember this is the President of the United States and the First Lady on inauguration day!"
Please address the REST of the 1,280 word body of work. Thoughts? Comments? Remarks? Anything at all would be an improvement on what has been offered up to date by respondents.

James, I didn't address your 1280 words because they didn't support your concluding statement. I asked you in my post to move beyond insisting that the dag is Lincoln and Mary Lincoln taken on Inauguration day evening, March 4, 1861 based solely on the image. All you have done is insist all the experts who have said it is not Lincoln and Mary are wrong. I had really hoped that my questions would give you another area to research and support your claim. That didn't happen.

Why can't you answer the questions I posed or be willing to investigate? Who was the photographer; why outdated dag photography used when glass plate prints were state of the art used by Washington's top photographers in 1861; when on inauguration day did they sit for the portrait; why was this major event not documented in the record; why are there no witness accounts?

With all due respect I will not reply until you can come up with new documentation.

Best,
Anita