New Development in Booth Case Coming Soon

[Jenny]

I’ll probably watch it although it’d better have DNA evidence to convince me that the mummy is actually Booth... which it won’t have.

‘“Facial characteristics can be like a fingerprint, but much depends on “the quality of the photos,” said D’Ovidio. “That’s a huge factor. The best samples are taken in controlled environments. You’re not going to get 90 percent accuracy if you have photos of questionable quality.”‘

Absolutely. And the John St. Helens picture was damaged straight down the face. Not to mention that it looks as though only one side of both men’s faces are being compared, and humans do not have completely identical facial features on both sides (one eye brow is often lower, chins often have curves, etc). That adds to the unreliability.

EDIT: And Robert LC beat me to the punch!