The Reason Lincoln Had to Die

[AussieMick]

(01-19-2019 03:34 PM)mikegriffith1 Wrote:  I see responses that ignore at least half of the evidence I've presented and that offer illogical arguments about the evidence they do manage to discuss.

Mike, I know you will not pay much heed to this but I must write it.

I'm willing to admit (and I think many other would agree) that there are issues involving the assassination the full details about which we are unlikely to ever know. There are (IMO) inconsistencies in the various accounts.

It seems to me that you have identified some of these points. And you've managed to produce some possible scenarios which address some of the inconsistencies.

Unfortunately you insist on highlighting 'inconsistencies' that are either minor (no real impact on the main events) or which exist only as a result of poorly documented 'evidence' or which conflict with other evidence that is as solid as can be expected for those times.

(No, I'm not going to itemise all of them)

Mike, if there were no inconsistencies then (IMO) it would be highly suspicious. Everything neat and tidy. Everything explained. Thats when I would suspect a cover-up.

You'd do better (I suggest) by focusing on the major flaw/unknowns in the accepted account of events and ripping into them. But then of course your thesis (if I may call it that) would be much harder work for you and much less dramatic.