My Journey on Lincoln's Assassination

[Gene C]

Weichmann and Lloyd are unreliable, but Surratt isn't?
A man who stayed hidden while his mother was on trial for her life and could have given testimony to save her life is more credible?
I consider that incredible and inexcusable.

I mean, good grief, Loux repeated Weichmann's and Lloyd's doubtful stories without saying a word about the evidence that their stories were obtained by coercion, much less about any of the problems with their stories. I mean, are you serious?

I've heard the comment made before, but what "evidence' is there that their testimony was coerced?