Forum Member on Travel Channel

[L Verge]

(07-03-2018 01:15 PM)Gene C Wrote:  I wonder if the SAG-AFTRA union (Screen Actors Guild and the American Federation of Television and Radios Artist) had anything to do with this?
Why use real professional historians, when an actor can play the part?

Of course, I agree that professional historians should always have a role in good history films; but budgets (especially with small companies) is a big issue. In their defense, I will say that I have met about a half-dozen actors who have really boned up on their subject matter ahead of time and did better than the directors and producers at giving accurate portrayals.

I cannot remember the name of the company or the project, but about 5-6 years ago, I was absolutely amazed to find out how knowledgeable the whole cast was on the conspirators that they were portraying. The crew spent two days at Surratt House, and during a lunch break, the actors all sat on the chairs and floor in my office and discussed history, asked my feelings on how certain personalities should be portrayed, etc.

Again, my memory fails me, but there is/was a company based in Gettysburg that did great history videos about thirty years ago. Their director, a young female about 30, blew me away with how much she knew about the Lincoln assassination. I asked how long she had studied it. She replied, "About six weeks, ever since I was given this assignment." The final result was one of the best tellings of the history that I have ever seen. As soon as I remember the name of the company or the video, I'll let you know -- even if it's 2 am.

---

Just remembered the company - Greystone Productions.