Otto Eisenschiml
|
04-19-2018, 04:04 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Otto Eisenschiml
Danny, the book espoused the hypothesis that Secretary of War Edwin Stanton was directly involved in Lincoln's death. It alleged that Stanton was against Lincoln's mild Reconstruction policies and wanted him out of office so a more radical Reconstruction policy could be employed. On the day of the assassination Ulysses S. Grant was expected to attend Our American Cousin with the Lincolns. Eisenschiml argued that had Grant attended, the military guards who protected him would never have allowed Booth to enter the State Box at Ford's Theatre. Eisenschiml further argued that Grant's refusal of the Lincolns' theater invitation was due to an order by Stanton to change his plans for the evening. Eisenschiml's theory was that Grant's absence left Lincoln vulnerable. Stanton was also alleged to have known that conspirators were meeting at the Surratt boardinghouse, and that he refused to release from duty the powerful Major Thomas T. Eckert after Lincoln asked for him as a bodyguard (stating that Eckert had vital work to do at the War Department's Telegraph Office). Eisenschiml continued from there to make a case against Stanton by examining an entire series of events following Booth's shot. Nearly every move Stanton made is seen as suspicious and containing an ulterior motive. Among these behaviors and events were not alerting the security at the Navy Yard Bridge (over which Booth escaped), the mysterious alleged interruption of telegraph communications, secretly arranging to have Booth killed before being brought to trial, and the suppression of evidence by removing pages from Booth's diary. Eisenschiml also noted the unreliability of John Parker who accompanied the Lincoln party inside the theater.
Although many historians dismiss Eisenschiml's book, I personally find the book interesting (although I do not believe the author's conclusion). Eisenschiml does ask some good questions. For example, what did happen to the missing pages in Booth's diary? No one knows with 100% certainty. Danny, this post just reflects my personal opinion. Maybe others will see things differently. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Otto Eisenschiml - DannyW - 04-19-2018, 02:27 AM
RE: Otto Eisenschiml - RJNorton - 04-19-2018 04:04 AM
RE: Otto Eisenschiml - Wild Bill - 04-19-2018, 06:20 AM
RE: Otto Eisenschiml - brtmchl - 04-19-2018, 11:32 AM
RE: Otto Eisenschiml - Gene C - 04-19-2018, 11:36 AM
RE: Otto Eisenschiml - Susan Higginbotham - 04-19-2018, 12:58 PM
RE: Otto Eisenschiml - JMadonna - 04-19-2018, 03:58 PM
RE: Otto Eisenschiml - richard petersen - 04-21-2018, 07:01 PM
RE: Otto Eisenschiml - DannyW - 04-22-2018, 10:23 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)