Post Reply 
Mary was a leaker
10-30-2017, 07:58 PM (This post was last modified: 10-30-2017 08:10 PM by kerry.)
Post: #37
RE: Mary was a leaker
Lincoln seems to have gone before a committee to testify about the leaked message, not accusations of disloyalty. I think that is where the story went awry, and it was rightly questioned, but the debunkers didn't realize the event was an inaccurate telling of Lincoln's appearance under other circumstances. The Hickman committee was supposed to be investigating censorship of the telegraph wires and that led them to investigate the leak somehow. Disloyalty does not seem to have been involved, except for the fact that it was known Watt had been accused of disloyalty but Lincoln retained him and promoted him.

This traces the rumor's history: https://books.google.com/books?id=wYmvvE...ee&f=false

All that detail was supposed to be remembered thirdhand or more, and while the author concludes it must be false due to the inaccuracies, it could have been just a garbled translation of his meeting with the House Judiciary Committee.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Mary was a leaker - L Verge - 08-02-2017, 09:22 AM
RE: Mary was a leaker - RJNorton - 08-02-2017, 09:52 AM
RE: Mary was a leaker - David Lockmiller - 10-15-2017, 09:11 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - Thomas Kearney - 08-02-2017, 09:54 AM
RE: Mary was a leaker - Steve - 08-02-2017, 10:10 AM
RE: Mary was a leaker - Gene C - 08-02-2017, 10:24 AM
RE: Mary was a leaker - kerry - 08-02-2017, 05:08 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - DannyW - 10-10-2017, 10:48 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - Donna McCreary - 10-10-2017, 11:24 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - David Lockmiller - 10-11-2017, 10:52 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - RJNorton - 10-12-2017, 04:12 AM
RE: Mary was a leaker - David Lockmiller - 10-12-2017, 09:13 AM
RE: Mary was a leaker - David Lockmiller - 10-15-2017, 10:19 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - Susan Higginbotham - 10-12-2017, 07:53 AM
RE: Mary was a leaker - RJNorton - 10-13-2017, 04:54 AM
RE: Mary was a leaker - David Lockmiller - 10-13-2017, 07:36 AM
RE: Mary was a leaker - RJNorton - 10-16-2017, 04:30 AM
RE: Mary was a leaker - David Lockmiller - 10-16-2017, 06:03 AM
RE: Mary was a leaker - David Lockmiller - 10-16-2017, 10:36 AM
RE: Mary was a leaker - Gene C - 10-17-2017, 10:01 AM
RE: Mary was a leaker - David Lockmiller - 10-17-2017, 10:00 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - JMadonna - 10-17-2017, 01:21 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - RJNorton - 10-17-2017, 02:18 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - kerry - 10-26-2017, 09:11 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - Steve - 10-27-2017, 04:51 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - kerry - 10-27-2017, 08:33 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - Steve - 10-27-2017, 11:57 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - RJNorton - 10-28-2017, 04:05 AM
RE: Mary was a leaker - kerry - 10-28-2017, 10:57 AM
RE: Mary was a leaker - kerry - 10-28-2017, 08:39 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - RJNorton - 10-29-2017, 09:00 AM
RE: Mary was a leaker - kerry - 10-29-2017, 06:23 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - RJNorton - 10-30-2017, 12:33 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - David Lockmiller - 10-30-2017, 01:15 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - Steve - 10-28-2017, 11:22 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - Steve - 10-30-2017, 06:58 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - kerry - 10-30-2017 07:58 PM
RE: Mary was a leaker - Steve - 10-30-2017, 10:25 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)