This change is not good:
|
05-23-2017, 04:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-24-2017 06:53 AM by Gene C.)
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: This change is not good:
That would mean 82% were antificient?
Or would it be inefficient? ![]() They probably ain't to good in grammer neither. So when is this "Old Enough To Know Better" supposed to kick in? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
This change is not good: - L Verge - 05-23-2017, 04:09 PM
RE: This change is not good: - Gene C - 05-23-2017 04:42 PM
RE: This change is not good: - DannyW - 05-23-2017, 05:08 PM
RE: This change is not good: - ELCore - 05-23-2017, 07:41 PM
RE: This change is not good: - L Verge - 05-24-2017, 09:46 AM
RE: This change is not good: - LincolnMan - 05-24-2017, 10:21 AM
RE: This change is not good: - Gene C - 05-24-2017, 10:48 AM
RE: This change is not good: - Eva Elisabeth - 05-25-2017, 04:56 AM
RE: This change is not good: - L Verge - 05-25-2017, 11:40 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)