Post Reply 
Why (not), Mary?
08-19-2015, 04:47 AM
Post: #4
RE: Why (not), Mary?
(08-19-2015 02:09 AM)Eva Elisabeth Wrote:  I wondered if the name was made a taboo to repress memories.

I think that is a good point, Eva. I don't think there is any mention of the Booth name in her letters. She did once mention the word "Surratt" in an 1867 letter to David Davis. She mentioned to Davis that Robert and Tad were in Washington for the John Surratt trial.

Also, I think I read that Johnson wrote her a sympathy note early in 1866. Mary threw it in her trash; someone found it there.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Why (not), Mary? - Eva Elisabeth - 08-18-2015, 05:50 PM
RE: Why (not), Mary? - Gene C - 08-18-2015, 06:41 PM
RE: Why (not), Mary? - Eva Elisabeth - 08-19-2015, 02:09 AM
RE: Why (not), Mary? - RJNorton - 08-19-2015 04:47 AM
RE: Why (not), Mary? - Donna McCreary - 08-20-2015, 08:26 PM
RE: Why (not), Mary? - Eva Elisabeth - 08-21-2015, 06:05 AM
RE: Why (not), Mary? - Eva Elisabeth - 08-19-2015, 05:52 AM
RE: Why (not), Mary? - RJNorton - 08-19-2015, 07:13 AM
RE: Why (not), Mary? - Eva Elisabeth - 08-19-2015, 11:03 AM
RE: Why (not), Mary? - LincolnToddFan - 08-20-2015, 09:09 PM
RE: Why (not), Mary? - RJNorton - 08-21-2015, 04:01 AM
RE: Why (not), Mary? - Donna McCreary - 08-22-2015, 07:59 PM
RE: Why (not), Mary? - Anita - 08-23-2015, 04:44 PM
RE: Why (not), Mary? - Eva Elisabeth - 08-23-2015, 04:56 PM
RE: Why (not), Mary? - RJNorton - 08-24-2015, 03:55 AM
RE: Why (not), Mary? - Anita - 08-24-2015, 09:57 AM
RE: Why (not), Mary? - RJNorton - 08-24-2015, 04:05 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)