Post Reply 
The Civil War’s Environmental Impact
11-21-2014, 04:46 PM (This post was last modified: 11-21-2014 11:12 PM by Anita.)
Post: #2
RE: The Civil War’s Environmental Impact
One environmental impact not mentioned in the article was the practice of embalming Civil War dead. Dr. Holmes, father of modern-day embalming "developed a supposed nontoxic embalming solution which was, indeed, toxic and to this day continues to contaminate the soil in older cemeteries. Those who practiced embalming during the war returned to their hometowns and continued to perform the service in lieu of returning to their former trades. As for Holmes, he requested before his death in 1900 that he not be embalmed."
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009...z3JjpJyur1


IMO as long as there is war the environment will be considered collateral damage. I don't see an end to wars any time soon.
"Unintentional or incidental injury or damage to persons or objects that would not be lawful military targets in the circumstances ruling at the time. Such damage is not unlawful so long as it is not excessive in light of the overall military advantage anticipated from the attack." Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. US Department of Defense 2005.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: The Civil War’s Environmental Impact - Anita - 11-21-2014 04:46 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)