Post Reply 
Mary Todd Lincoln's faux pas (plural), worse, and much worse
07-03-2014, 06:05 PM (This post was last modified: 07-04-2014 07:05 AM by Eva Elisabeth.)
Post: #53
RE: Mary Todd Lincoln's faux pas (plural), worse, and much worse
Why compared to 1865 was taking note of " unpleasant displays of a lack of discretion" that unavoidable in 1867 so that the "respect for the memory of one of the best loved and most worthy of the sons of the republic" could be neglected then?

Don't you consider it odd that not any 1865 account exits of such an - as I understand you think - obvious, inexcusable public faux-pas? And what would you say if a court judged someone guilty of a deed only upon the deed's mentioning in a newspaper article two years later - without any witness' name or sources?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Mary Todd Lincoln's faux pas - Gene C - 06-12-2014, 09:32 AM
RE: Mary Todd Lincoln's faux pas (plural), worse, and much worse - Eva Elisabeth - 07-03-2014 06:05 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)