Post Reply 
The Union vs. Dr. Mudd
08-24-2012, 03:54 PM (This post was last modified: 08-24-2012 03:56 PM by RJNorton.)
Post: #6
RE: The Union vs. Dr. Mudd
The case is discussed here.

For what it's worth, Wikipedia says the Supreme Court ruled in this case that:

(1) A pardoned man must introduce the pardon into court proceedings, otherwise the pardon must be disregarded by the court.

(2) To do this, the pardoned man must accept the pardon. If a pardon is rejected, it cannot be forced upon its subject.

(3) A pardon carries an 'imputation of guilt', and accepting a pardon is 'an admission of guilt'.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
The Union vs. Dr. Mudd - RJNorton - 07-10-2012, 08:24 AM
RE: The Union vs. Dr. Mudd - LincolnMan - 08-23-2012, 05:14 PM
RE: The Union vs. Dr. Mudd - L Verge - 08-23-2012, 06:58 PM
RE: The Union vs. Dr. Mudd - RJNorton - 08-24-2012, 02:41 PM
RE: The Union vs. Dr. Mudd - Laurie Verge - 08-24-2012, 03:18 PM
RE: The Union vs. Dr. Mudd - RJNorton - 08-24-2012 03:54 PM
RE: The Union vs. Dr. Mudd - LincolnMan - 09-11-2012, 01:05 PM
RE: The Union vs. Dr. Mudd - BettyO - 09-11-2012, 01:08 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)