Post Reply 
Booth/St. Helens 1904 facial comparison
04-18-2014, 07:49 PM (This post was last modified: 04-18-2014 07:58 PM by Jenny.)
Post: #8
RE: Booth/St. Helens 1904 facial comparison
Oh, the name is "St. Helen" without an "s." Oops. It's been a looong time since I've thought about this in detail. Apologies.

Not sure if you are just stating the names or implying that these were two different men. Wink If it's the first, ignore the following.

I believe Bates went to Enid and identified David E. George's body, concluding it was the same man as "John St. Helen" who had allegedly confessed to Bates that he was JWB thirty years prior in Granbury, Texas. So the picture of John St. Helen used for the comparison would have been the same man who was the actual mummy. David E. George = John St. Helen ("St. Helen" in reference to the island Napoleon was exiled, St. Helena). Same imposter using two different names at different times and places.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Booth/St. Helens 1904 facial comparison - Jenny - 04-18-2014 07:49 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)