Booth/St. Helens 1904 facial comparison
|
04-18-2014, 07:49 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-18-2014 07:58 PM by Jenny.)
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Booth/St. Helens 1904 facial comparison
Oh, the name is "St. Helen" without an "s." Oops. It's been a looong time since I've thought about this in detail. Apologies.
Not sure if you are just stating the names or implying that these were two different men. If it's the first, ignore the following. I believe Bates went to Enid and identified David E. George's body, concluding it was the same man as "John St. Helen" who had allegedly confessed to Bates that he was JWB thirty years prior in Granbury, Texas. So the picture of John St. Helen used for the comparison would have been the same man who was the actual mummy. David E. George = John St. Helen ("St. Helen" in reference to the island Napoleon was exiled, St. Helena). Same imposter using two different names at different times and places. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)