(06-07-2013, 06:52 PM)L Verge Wrote: Okay, that disproves the book's claim that Clement Clay was the son of Henry. The book's at work, so I will double-check again to make sure I did not misquote.
I believe that it was copyrighted in Canada in 1957, and in the U.S. in 1859. I'll double-check that also. I'm working at the museum tomorrow.
I double-checked the Clay mention, and the author did err in saying that Clement Clay was the son of Henry. I apologize on his behalf. I will also apologize for my typo above. The U.S. copyright on the book was 1959 - not 1859...