Post Reply 
Lincoln as Commander in Chief
03-16-2013, 08:37 PM
Post: #20
RE: Lincoln as Commander in Chief
(03-16-2013 09:28 AM)Mike B. Wrote:  I think "On to Richmond" was actually a proper strategy. If the Army of Northern Viriginia could have been cooped up in Richmond in a siege it would have had to surrender in mass.

The surrender of Richmond early in the war would not have ended the war, neither would a surrender of Washington.

Besides if you cooped up the Army of Northern Virginia they still would have been supplied via Georgia.

The art of war says you don't hit your opponent where he's strongest you hit him where he's weak and force him out of his strong position. It took the Feds a good year to learn frontal assaults were suicide.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Lincoln as Commander in Chief - LincolnMan - 03-03-2013, 05:06 PM
RE: Lincoln as Commander in Chief - Gene C - 03-04-2013, 09:57 AM
RE: Lincoln as Commander in Chief - JMadonna - 03-16-2013 08:37 PM
RE: Lincoln as Commander in Chief - Gene C - 03-19-2013, 06:42 PM
RE: Lincoln as Commander in Chief - Hess1865 - 03-21-2013, 07:56 PM
RE: Lincoln as Commander in Chief - Hess1865 - 03-27-2013, 07:37 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)