|
09-23-2012, 09:53 AM,
|
|
|
BettyO
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 3,596
Threads: 266
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
Powell's Hair being "Filed?" What's THAT about?!
Found an article in the Baltimore Clipper the other day stating that Powell sported a "different appearance" in the courtroom - his hair being "filed".
I have gone through every Victorian manual and dictionary - yes including Barber's manuals, available... any suggestion as to what having one's hair "filed" involved?
About this time, Lew Powell had been given what we today call a "crew cut" - could that be what this is?
Just curious....
Anyone really know what this meant?
Thanks!
"The Past is a foreign country...they do things differently there" - L. P. Hartley
|
|
|
09-23-2012, 01:32 PM,
(This post was last modified: 09-23-2012, 01:36 PM by BettyO.)
|
|
|
BettyO
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 3,596
Threads: 266
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: Powell's Hair being "Filed?" What's THAT about?!
I would have to agree with both Laurie and Maddie -
No - it's not a misprint because I've found one other reference to it - and it's called "filed" in both accounts.... I think it means close cut - but I'd love to know for sure....
The only thing that I can come up with would be the fact that since we know that he had his hair cut in mid June and again on July 4 (as per the Hartranft Letter Books) then it must be Victorian slang or a euphemism for what we commonly call a "crew cut" or "buzz cut" today.... but I would love to find a documented reference to it; such as how was it done? Cut short withi scissors and then razored? Or was it simply razored? That would be pretty drastic - I couldn't imagine putting a straight razor on anyone's head! OUCH!!
"The Past is a foreign country...they do things differently there" - L. P. Hartley
|
|
|
|
09-23-2012, 01:42 PM,
|
|
|
Linda Anderson
Legendary Member
     
|
Posts: 1,086
Threads: 99
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: Powell's Hair being "Filed?" What's THAT about?!
Betty, I found a reference to hair filing in a dissertation by Florence Lyons-Fontenot called "BEYOND BOUNDARIES: POLITICAL DICTATES FOUND IN MINSTRELSY"
"Minstrel performances stated that blacks 'had to have their hair filed, not cut...' (Toll 67)." p. 25.
Toll, Robert C. Blacking Up. New York: Oxford University Press, 1974.
http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-11...ot_dis.pdf
|
|
|
|
09-23-2012, 03:22 PM,
|
|
|
Linda Anderson
Legendary Member
     
|
Posts: 1,086
Threads: 99
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
|
RE: Powell's Hair being "Filed?" What's THAT about?!
I found a "snippet view" on Google of Blacking Up: The Minstrel Show in Nineteenth Century: "At times, minstrels even claimed that Negroes had to have their hair filed, not cut.."
From the dissertation "BEYOND BOUNDARIES: POLITICAL DICTATES FOUND IN MINSTRELSY:"
"Minstrel discourse routinely declared that blacks, because they had different physical characteristics than whites, were inhuman and therefore inferior. Minstrel performances stated that blacks 'had to have their hair filed, not cut...'" and so on.
So saying that African Americans needed their hair filed and not cut was part of the minstrels' racist stereotyping. No one actually had their hair "filed." It's interesting that the reporter used that term, in quotes, to describe Powell's haircut. Was it a slang term for the buzz cut or was the reporter implying that Powell had the same type of hair as African Americans?
|
|
|
|