|
11-13-2013, 11:47 PM,
|
|
|
|
RE: The book proposal
"Women against women" may be what it seems like on the surface, but I think there is much more to it. Anyway, I'm glad Abe had more sense than Ida on that issue.
|
|
|
11-14-2013, 11:05 AM,
(This post was last modified: 11-14-2013, 11:05 AM by Rob Wick.)
|
|
|
Rob Wick
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 3,038
Threads: 196
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: The book proposal
Joe,
I read Pringle's two-volume biography of Taft on a lark, and it was one of the most interesting presidential biographies I've read. Plus, if I could write half as well as Edmund Morris......
Anyone interested to see the firepower that S.S. McClure had on his staff should go to the Internet Archive and browse the copies available of McClure's Magazine. Not only did he have Tarbell, Ray Baker and Lincoln Steffans, but he was one of the first to recognize the talent of Kipling and O. Henry. One of the unsung heroes of McClure's Magazine was a woman named Viola Roseboro, who had a knack for discovering writers. It's a fascinating story.
Best
Rob
Abraham Lincoln is the only man, dead or alive, with whom I could have spent five years without one hour of boredom.--Ida M. Tarbell
I want the respect of intelligent men, but I will choose for myself the intelligent.
--Carl Sandburg
|
|
|
|
11-14-2013, 11:10 AM,
|
|
|
Liz Rosenthal
Senior Member
   
|
Posts: 250
Threads: 7
Joined: Dec 2012
|
|
RE: The book proposal
Rob:
I've had printer trouble, so I haven't read your proposal yet, but I've skimmed it, and it looks really thorough!
Regarding Abe and women's suffrage, I think (not sure) the source is a campaign tract in the 1830s in which he was discussing expanding the vote and he tacked on this clause at the end: "by no means excluding women."
(11-13-2013, 10:36 PM)Rob Wick Wrote: Kate,
It's hard to boil down her reasoning (even in a 12-page letter to her friend John S. Phillips, she couldn't do it very easily), but simplistically, Tarbell didn't think women having the vote would better their situations, nor did she think women could do any better in picking leaders then men could. It wasn't just in suffrage that Tarbell was contradictory. She thought a woman's first priority should be marriage, a home and raising children, yet she prayed at the age of 14 that she never have to marry. There's a book called Women Against Women: American Anti-Suffragism, 1880-1920 by Jane Camhi in which she devotes a whole chapter to Tarbell's case.
I have to admit I don't recall ever hearing Lincoln talk about the subject of women and suffrage, but there are websites which claim he made a speech as a state legislator that supported the concept. Looking through the collected works, I don't find it. Maybe someone else can.
Thanks for your kind words on my proposal. As for your project, go for it!
Best
Rob
|
|
|
|
11-14-2013, 01:22 PM,
|
|
|
brtmchl
Forum Master
    
|
Posts: 414
Threads: 9
Joined: Dec 2012
|
|
|
RE: The book proposal
I have never heard that Eva, but that is very interesting. I had always believed that the right to vote post Revolution was reserved for only white male landowners. Landowners were mostly Protestant. I think that in addition to Blacks, Women, and Whites who did not own a qualifying amount of land and property, Jews and Catholics were also not allowed voting rights.
" Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the American Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford
|
|
|
11-14-2013, 07:45 PM,
(This post was last modified: 11-15-2013, 02:29 AM by My Name Is Kate.)
|
|
|
|
RE: The book proposal
It sounds like women were no more citizens of this country than slaves. They didn't have the right to vote, rarely if ever held office, were employed only in the lowest occupations if at all, and were basically the property of their husbands, producing on average a dozen children each, about half of whom died in infancy. And children had no rights at all. Sure glad I didn't live in those days.
OTOH, I doubt that anyone in the old days had to worry about some pre-teen, AK-47-toting terrorist who might blow off someone's head for looking wrong at him.
|
|
|
11-14-2013, 08:25 PM,
(This post was last modified: 11-14-2013, 08:32 PM by Eva Elisabeth.)
|
|
|
Eva Elisabeth
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 6,598
Threads: 69
Joined: Apr 2013
|
|
RE: The book proposal
(11-14-2013, 07:45 PM)My Name Is Kate Wrote: It sounds like women were no more citizens of this country than slaves. They didn't have the right to vote, rarely if ever held office, were employed only in the lowest occupations if at all, and were basically the property of their husbands, producing on average about a dozen children each, about half of whom often died in infancy. And children had no rights at all. Sure glad I didn't live in those days. Well, Kate, just one more aside (referring to your last sentence): The fist time women were allowed to study law at Harvard was in 1950 (although the first woman applied in 1870!) and at Washington and Lee University in 1972, just two examples. Sometimes, those days seem not too far away.
|
|
|
11-14-2013, 08:54 PM,
(This post was last modified: 11-15-2013, 02:28 AM by My Name Is Kate.)
|
|
|
|
RE: The book proposal
Now I'm beginning to see why slavery was considered an accepted practice. Half the population was without citizenship and (almost) no one gave it a thought. Probably even most women thought it was just the way it is and should not be changed. Even today, there still exist some forms of slavery, and in this country, such as human trafficking...
|
|
|
|