+- Lincoln Discussion Symposium (https://rogerjnorton.com/LincolnDiscussionSymposium)
+-- Forum: Lincoln Discussion Symposium (/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Abraham Lincoln - The White House Years (/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: Lincoln and Taney (/thread-2168.html)
Pages: 1 2
RE: Lincoln and Taney - Gene C - 02-05-2015 10:26 AM
(02-04-2015 07:23 PM)L Verge Wrote: IHere's a trivia question: Who was the wife of Roger B. Taney? And, don't say "Mrs. Taney..."
You mean it wasn't Mrs. Taney?
He married the sister of Fransis Scott Key, and her name was Anne Key
RE: Lincoln and Taney - L Verge - 02-05-2015 02:23 PM
A+ for you, Gene.
RE: Lincoln and Taney - HerbS - 02-05-2015 05:14 PM
Dred Scott was a fortunate opportunist!
RE: Lincoln and Taney - LincolnToddFan - 02-05-2015 09:05 PM
(02-04-2015 06:56 PM)HerbS Wrote: Taney was the Author of the Fugitive Slave Law,was he not.If not, I stand corrected with my thoughts about him being a racist.
You do not need to be corrected about Taney being a racist. The great majority of Americans in the 19th century(including Abraham Lincoln) believed in the inherit inferiority of anyone not Anglo-Saxon.
Fair enough with the argument that Taney was "just upholding the Constitution". So how come most legal minds and historians today-quite respected and brilliant ones- are in agreement that the Dred Scott decision was one of the worst decisions ever in the history of American jurisprudence?
I lose patience with the idea that cruelty and injustice can be excused as long as it's legal.
RE: Lincoln and Taney - Thomas Thorne - 02-06-2015 02:27 AM
I think we're mixing up some of Roger Taney's Supreme Court decisions.
In Dred Scott in 1857 he wrote the plurality opinion denying Congress's constitutional authority to prohibit or regulate slavery in the territories. This would have been news to the Framers who selectively did so at various times and places.
In Ableman in 1859 he and a unanimous court invalidated a Wisconsin Supreme Court decision which stated that Wisconsin courts had the authority to impede enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act which owed its legal legitimacy to the constitutional obligation to return fugitives.
Various northern states which had passed Personal Liberty Laws to prevent enforcement of the Fugitive Slave act of 1850 had a very different view of defiance of Federal authority when done by persons with Southern accents in 1860-61.
In Merryman in 1861 Taney acted in his capacity as Federal circuit course judge, a function Supreme Court justices no longer have. The history of Merryman is fascinating.
I'm sure everyone remembers Baltimore pro Confederate persons-dare we call them mobs-attacked the 7th Massachusetts as it marched thru Baltimore after Sumter. The Maryland legislature subsequently voted to remain in the Union but tried a form of neutrality totally unacceptable to the Lincoln Administration. The Maryland lawmakers prohibited troop movements by rail to Washington. In pursuance of this the Governor of Maryland ordered the state militia to demolish state owned railroad bridges. Lt Merryman of the Maryland militia was arrested by Federal troops for destroying 6 railroad bridges and certain telegraph lines.
Justice Taney in his circuit court capacity made the very narrow but correct ruling that only Congress and not the President could suspend Habeas Corpus.
But the United States government was not through with Lt Merryman. A Federal grand jury indicted him for treason. But one of the 2 trial judges assigned to his case serially delayed the trial for over 3 years when finally the judge died.
That judge was Roger Taney.
Taney's blatant sabotage of a judicial proceeding was in marked contrast to his other Southern born Supreme Court colleagues in similar cases. Justice Catron of Tennessee won Northern applause when he instructed a jury that armed resistance to the United States was treason.
Tom
RE: Lincoln and Taney - LincolnToddFan - 02-06-2015 09:25 AM
Thanks Thomas, that is very interesting information.
RE: Lincoln and Taney - L Verge - 02-06-2015 09:43 AM
A very good synopsis, Thomas. Thank you.
Personally, I do not believe that it is fair to judge any of the Supreme Court justices who ruled in these touchy cases regarding slavery prior to the Civil War. Unlike some modern jurists who feel that they can dictate moral judgments, the primary duty of any appointed to the Supreme Court should be to interpret the laws and cases according to their constitutionality. If the feeling is strong that things need to be changed for the common good, then it is the responsibility of Congress to enact legislation or Constitutional amendments to that effect.
I have been meaning to mention that there is always a discussion as to how to pronounce "Taney." He was a Southern Marylander by birth, and the family's pronunciation (but not the spelling) was "Tawney." I have always suspected that, centuries before, the original spelling might have been with a "w" or "u" inserted that would make that pronunciation evident.