|
07-28-2012, 08:56 PM,
|
|
|
LincolnMan
Hero Member
      
|
Posts: 5,433
Threads: 161
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
|
RE: Did Booth have another pistol?
Yes, I found the article. See Civil War Times Illustrated, Volume XIII, Number 9, January 1975, Page 20. The article is Booth's Other Pistol by Hamilton Cochran. It says that a Mr. James J. Gifford found the weapon and it had the name J. Wilkes Booth engraved on the butt plate. He found it at Ford's on the morning of the 15th. Gifford was a stage carpenter. According to the article, Gifford thought he had the murder weapon and feared turning it in to the authorities. It is a smaller derringer than the actual murder weapon used. He held on to it for years. It wasn't until 1901 that anything was said about the weapon. By then, Gifford had died and it belonged to a George Plowman. Plowman also thought that it was the murder weapon. The story continues but is too long to repeat here. The author of the article now owns the weapon himself (at least as of the date of the writing). He concludes the piece by speculating about the weapon. Did Booth carry two pistols? If he didn't, how did it get into Ford's theater-and on April 15th? Why does it have Booth's name on it-if it didn't belong to Booth? It sounds like the author believes-but can't be positive in the end- that Booth brought both weapons to Ford's. He suggests it either fell from Booth by accident or Booth tossed it aside. Still, he ends: "Unfortunately the answer will never be known. It is buried in the Booth family plot among the bones of the self-appointed executioner of President Abraham Lincoln."
Bill Nash
|
|
|
07-29-2012, 11:29 AM,
(This post was last modified: 07-29-2012, 11:35 AM by Wesley Harris.)
|
|
|
Wesley Harris
Senior Member
   
|
Posts: 145
Threads: 16
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: Did Booth have another pistol?
(07-29-2012, 10:53 AM)LincolnMan Wrote: Wesley: thanks for tracking it down. I'm a little saddened that it is there. If it is actually a weapon that belonged to Booth-it would seem to be in the wrong place. Of course, the problem is that it can't be proven to be so. I wonder what the various scholars have thought about it.
The academic historians have largely ignored the details of the assassination. That's why most of the books that delve into the criminal aspects of the assassination are written outside of academia. Also the reason I'm writing a book on the weapons used by Booth and his conspirators. Just like in a standard criminal investigation, the physical evidence like the weapons can tell us much about the suspects. For example, my research has convinced me that that Booth and the other conspirators were generally inept with firearms.
I will be discussing the Ripley pistol and other weapons associated with the assassination at the Surratt Society's 2013 Annual Lincoln Assassination Conference. TOOLS OF THE ASSASSINS, Part II: Fables, Fallacies, and Fakes. Watch www.surratt.org for details.
|
|
|
|