|
11-14-2012, 02:31 PM,
|
|
|
JMadonna
Forum Master
    
|
Posts: 899
Threads: 17
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: Booth's visit to the Surratt Boarding House after the assassination
(11-14-2012, 01:41 PM)J. Beckert Wrote: We don't know if he had a holster on at Ford's. That was observed by one of the Garrett's, I believe.
The point of Richter's theory is that he had no gun or holster at the theater but he had them at Garrett's. What I hear you saying is that he MAY have had a secret gun at the theater, but no holster. If true why would he stop along the way to pick up an empty holster? If your theory is correct and he had it in his pocket, he would have no need to stop and pick up a holster.
In short, the gun and holster are an inseparable pair. He either had them both on his person at all times or he picked up both after the shooting.
|
|
|
11-14-2012, 06:05 PM,
(This post was last modified: 11-14-2012, 06:07 PM by Laurie Verge.)
|
|
|
Laurie Verge
Hero Member
     
|
Posts: 1,229
Threads: 69
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
|
RE: Booth's visit to the Surratt Boarding House after the assassination
Two silly questions from a stupid female who has never even held a gun of any kind: Would Booth choose a weapon like the deringer for the kill because its report would be "quieter?" He did time his deed with a line causing laughter from the audience to give him an advantage. I would think that a deringer popped where a revolver was louder. Then, as Joe pointed out, it was disposable where a revolver still had ammunition.
Also, if men carried revolvers frequently in those days, did they always use a holster? For some reason, I have assumed that Easterners especially kept them in pockets when in civilian dress.
Another question that I think Blaine Houmes answered at a Surratt conference, but I have forgotten. What is the damage done by a deringer in comparison to a revolver? I would assume small hole, less gore vs. large hole with large splatter? He was close to his target and would get dirty - as would Mrs. Lincoln. If one small gun inflicting one small, efficient hole gets the job done, I would go with it.
End of dumb blonde questions...
BTW: I got a phone call from my grandson (age 12) today who wanted me to know about a catalog called Betty's Attic that is featuring a replica of the Booth deringer in a display case. $99. There was a strong hint of Christmas present in his call - which I ignored.
|
|
|
|
11-14-2012, 06:29 PM,
|
|
|
JMadonna
Forum Master
    
|
Posts: 899
Threads: 17
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: Booth's visit to the Surratt Boarding House after the assassination
(11-14-2012, 04:17 PM)J. Beckert Wrote: My point (theory?) is that Booth was armed with more than a one shot pistol. .... Easily concealed and an excellent insurance policy.
I understand your point, but the reality is that there could be no insurance policy for Booth's plan.
When Booth pulled the trigger the derringer was at most 2 inches from Lincoln's ear. If the gun went 'click', how much time do you think Booth would have had to drop the derringer, put his hand in his pocket, grab his 'insurance policy' and re-aim it at Lincoln? A couple of seconds at least.
By that time, Lincoln would have had Booth's extended arm. I'm pretty sure that's how Booth saw it too, which is why his other hand held a dagger with which he could still deliver a blow at best or fend off Lincoln's retaliation and allow him to jump the rail.
|
|
|
|
11-14-2012, 06:38 PM,
|
|
|
Jim Garrett
Legendary Member
     
|
Posts: 1,374
Threads: 21
Joined: Aug 2012
|
|
RE: Booth's visit to the Surratt Boarding House after the assassination
(11-14-2012, 06:05 PM)Laurie Verge Wrote: Two silly questions from a stupid female who has never even held a gun of any kind: Would Booth choose a weapon like the deringer for the kill because its report would be "quieter?" He did time his deed with a line causing laughter from the audience to give him an advantage. I would think that a deringer popped where a revolver was louder. Then, as Joe pointed out, it was disposable where a revolver still had ammunition.
Also, if men carried revolvers frequently in those days, did they always use a holster? For some reason, I have assumed that Easterners especially kept them in pockets when in civilian dress.
Another question that I think Blaine Houmes answered at a Surratt conference, but I have forgotten. What is the damage done by a deringer in comparison to a revolver? I would assume small hole, less gore vs. large hole with large splatter? He was close to his target and would get dirty - as would Mrs. Lincoln. If one small gun inflicting one small, efficient hole gets the job done, I would go with it.
End of dumb blonde questions...
BTW: I got a phone call from my grandson (age 12) today who wanted me to know about a catalog called Betty's Attic that is featuring a replica of the Booth deringer in a display case. $99. There was a strong hint of Christmas present in his call - which I ignored.
The deringer was a 44 caliber, and was loaded with a 42 caliber round ball. The Colt "naval" revolver was a 36 caliber, actually smaller bore. The sound difference might not be that different. However the shot barrell, round ball and possibly less powder of the deringer would probably mean more damage.
|
|
|
11-14-2012, 06:44 PM,
(This post was last modified: 11-14-2012, 07:01 PM by JMadonna.)
|
|
|
JMadonna
Forum Master
    
|
Posts: 899
Threads: 17
Joined: Jul 2012
|
|
RE: Booth's visit to the Surratt Boarding House after the assassination
(11-14-2012, 06:05 PM)Laurie Verge Wrote: Would Booth choose a weapon like the deringer for the kill because its report would be "quieter?"
Also, if men carried revolvers frequently in those days, did they always use a holster? For some reason, I have assumed that Easterners especially kept them in pockets when in civilian dress.
End of dumb blonde questions...
Quest 1. - No, you would use a derringer because it's concealable. You can smile, reach out like you're going to shake someone's hand and shoot him in the head without the victim ever know what hit him. - Can't do that with a revolver.
Quest 2. - No, but if you had a holster AND a gun - you would keep them together. In Booth's case he had both but the issue was when and where he got them. Since no one had seen either at the theater ....
Quest 3 - How long has it been since you were a blonde?
(11-14-2012, 06:40 PM)J. Beckert Wrote: Could be Jerry and I see your point, also. As far as Booth holding his arm extended after the "click", I think he'd be a little faster going for the revolver, but who knows. It's all conjecture, but makes for good discussion.
If you're going to the conference, we'll discuss it over a beer with that crotchety ole mule shoer from Arizona.
Sounds good to me.
You know, thinking over Laurie' question I'll bet that's how Booth planned to shoot Lincoln. Extending his arm as if to shake his hand and shooting him point blank.
That was probably the reason he showed Forbes his card, hoping for an introduction but Forbes just waved him on. He certainly couldn't have known that Parker was AWOL.
Hmmm... better bring a pitcher of beer.
|
|
|
|